These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15835245)

  • 1. Use of the range area in organic egg production systems: effect of climatic factors, flock size, age and artificial cover.
    Hegelund L; Sørensen JT; Kjaer JB; Kristensen IS
    Br Poult Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15835245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of artificial structuring on the use of laying hen runs in a free-range system.
    Zeltner E; Hirt H
    Br Poult Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(4):533-7. PubMed ID: 14584842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of commercial laying hen genotypes on free range and organic farms in Switzerland, France and The Netherlands.
    Leenstra F; Maurer V; Bestman M; van Sambeek F; Zeltner E; Reuvekamp B; Galea F; van Niekerk T
    Br Poult Sci; 2012; 53(3):282-90. PubMed ID: 22978584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors influencing bacterial eggshell contamination in conventional cages, furnished cages and free-range systems for laying hens under commercial conditions.
    Huneau-Salaün A; Michel V; Huonnic D; Balaine L; Le Bouquin S
    Br Poult Sci; 2010 Apr; 51(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 20461576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vocalisations and acoustic parameters of flock noise from feather pecking and non-feather pecking laying flocks.
    Bright A
    Br Poult Sci; 2008 May; 49(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 18568747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of stocking density, flock size and management on the welfare of laying hens in single-tier aviaries.
    Nicol CJ; Brown SN; Glen E; Pope SJ; Short FJ; Warriss PD; Zimmerman PH; Wilkins LJ
    Br Poult Sci; 2006 Apr; 47(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 16641024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors affecting ranging behaviour in young and adult laying hens.
    Gilani AM; Knowles TG; Nicol CJ
    Br Poult Sci; 2014; 55(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 24571397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk factors for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica contamination in 519 French laying hen flocks at the end of the laying period.
    Huneau-Salaün A; Marianne C; Sophie le B; Françoise L; Isabelle P; Sandra R; Virginie M; Philippe F; Nicolas R
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 May; 89(1-2):51-8. PubMed ID: 19237216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Production and economic results of commercial flocks with white layers in aviary systems and battery cages.
    Van Horne PL
    Br Poult Sci; 1996 May; 37(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 8773835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of furnished cages for laying hens.
    Appleby MC; Walker AW; Nicol CJ; Lindberg AC; Freire R; Hughes BO; Elson HA
    Br Poult Sci; 2002 Sep; 43(4):489-500. PubMed ID: 12365505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of a multivariable indexing score for hygiene variables in relation to egg production.
    Mohammed HO; Carpenter TE
    Am J Vet Res; 1991 Jun; 52(6):970-3. PubMed ID: 1883104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal changes in distribution, prevalence and intensity of northern fowl mite (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) parasitism in commercial caged laying hens, with a comprehensive economic analysis of parasite impact.
    Mullens BA; Owen JP; Kuney DR; Szijj CE; Klingler KA
    Vet Parasitol; 2009 Mar; 160(1-2):116-33. PubMed ID: 19081198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of scheduled cage cleaning on older hens (Gallus gallus).
    Anderson KE; Mozdziak PE; Petitte JN
    Lab Anim (NY); 2010 Jul; 39(7):210-5. PubMed ID: 20567230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of the within and between flock prevalence and identification of risk factors for Salmonella infections in laying hen flocks housed in conventional and alternative systems.
    Van Hoorebeke S; Van Immerseel F; Schulz J; Hartung J; Harisberger M; Barco L; Ricci A; Theodoropoulos G; Xylouri E; De Vylder J; Ducatelle R; Haesebrouck F; Pasmans F; de Kruif A; Dewulf J
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Apr; 94(1-2):94-100. PubMed ID: 20031240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The effect of the husbandry system on comb size and comb color in hens].
    Fölsch DW; Sulzer B; Meier T; Huber HU
    Tierarztl Prax; 1994 Feb; 22(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 8165660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Occurence of salmonellae in laying hens in different housing systems and inferences for control].
    Methner U; Diller R; Reiche R; Böhland K
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006; 119(11-12):467-73. PubMed ID: 17172134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A longitudinal study of environmental Salmonella contamination in caged and free-range layer flocks.
    Wales A; Breslin M; Carter B; Sayers R; Davies R
    Avian Pathol; 2007 Jun; 36(3):187-97. PubMed ID: 17497330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Laying hens in alternative housing systems--practical experiences].
    Petermann S
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003 May; 110(5):220-4. PubMed ID: 12822262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ascarid infections in laying hens kept in different housing systems.
    Jansson DS; Nyman A; Vågsholm I; Christensson D; Göransson M; Fossum O; Höglund J
    Avian Pathol; 2010 Dec; 39(6):525-32. PubMed ID: 21154064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Matched concurrent case-control study of risk factors for feather pecking in hens on free-range commercial farms in the UK.
    Nicol CJ; Pötzsch C; Lewis K; Green LE
    Br Poult Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 14584840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.