These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1583546)

  • 1. Comparative analysis between epidural (Gaeltec) and subdural (Camino) intracranial pressure probes.
    Weinstabl C; Richling B; Plainer B; Czech T; Spiss CK
    J Clin Monit; 1992 Apr; 8(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 1583546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the Codman microsensor intracranial pressure monitoring system.
    Fernandes HM; Bingham K; Chambers IR; Mendelow AD
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1998; 71():44-6. PubMed ID: 9779140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice: reliability, handling characteristics and complications.
    Münch E; Weigel R; Schmiedek P; Schürer L
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1998; 140(11):1113-9; discussion 1119-20. PubMed ID: 9870055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of extradural and intraparenchymatous intracranial pressures in head injured patients.
    Bruder N; N'Zoghe P; Graziani N; Pelissier D; Grisoli F; François G
    Intensive Care Med; 1995 Oct; 21(10):850-2. PubMed ID: 8557876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Assessment in a 1000 cases.
    Gelabert-González M; Ginesta-Galan V; Sernamito-García R; Allut AG; Bandin-Diéguez J; Rumbo RM
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Apr; 148(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 16374566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is intracranial pressure monitoring in the epidural space reliable? Fact and fiction.
    Poca MA; Sahuquillo J; Topczewski T; Peñarrubia MJ; Muns A
    J Neurosurg; 2007 Apr; 106(4):548-56. PubMed ID: 17432703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The Spiegelberg device for epidural registration of the ICP].
    Schwarz N; Matuschka H; Meznik A
    Unfallchirurg; 1992 Mar; 95(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 1553562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intracranial pressure monitoring: fiberoptic monitor compared with the ventricular catheter.
    Schickner DJ; Young RF
    Surg Neurol; 1992 Apr; 37(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 1595034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical experience with a fiberoptic intracranial pressure monitor.
    Yablon JS; Lantner HJ; McCormack TM; Nair S; Barker E; Black P
    J Clin Monit; 1993 Jul; 9(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 8345369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intracranial pressure and clinical status: assessment of two intracranial pressure transducers.
    Banister K; Chambers IR; Siddique MS; Femandes HM; Mendelow AD
    Physiol Meas; 2000 Nov; 21(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 11110245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fiberoptic intraparenchymal brain pressure monitoring with the Camino V420 monitor: reflections on our experience in 163 severely head-injured patients.
    Poca MA; Sahuquillo J; Arribas M; Báguena M; Amorós S; Rubio E
    J Neurotrauma; 2002 Apr; 19(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 11990350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a new intracranial pressure monitoring device.
    Stendel R; Heidenreich J; Schilling A; Akhavan-Sigari R; Kurth R; Picht T; Pietilä T; Suess O; Kern C; Meisel J; Brock M
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2003 Mar; 145(3):185-93; discussion 193. PubMed ID: 12632114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ICP measurement accuracy: the effect of temperature drift. Design of a laboratory test for assessment of ICP transducers.
    Morgalla MH; Mettenleiter H; Katzenberger T
    J Med Eng Technol; 1999; 23(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 10202697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ICP measurement control: laboratory test of 7 types of intracranial pressure transducers.
    Morgalla MH; Mettenleiter H; Bitzer M; Fretschner R; Grote EH
    J Med Eng Technol; 1999; 23(4):144-51. PubMed ID: 10561825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of two methods of subdural pressure monitoring.
    Barlow P; Mendelow AD; Lawrence AE; Barlow M; Rowan JO
    J Neurosurg; 1985 Oct; 63(4):578-82. PubMed ID: 4032022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a fiberoptic intracranial pressure monitor.
    Crutchfield JS; Narayan RK; Robertson CS; Michael LH
    J Neurosurg; 1990 Mar; 72(3):482-7. PubMed ID: 2303881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results and complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in 303 children.
    Pople IK; Muhlbauer MS; Sanford RA; Kirk E
    Pediatr Neurosurg; 1995; 23(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 8555097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intracranial pressure monitoring techniques.
    Ghajar J
    New Horiz; 1995 Aug; 3(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 7496747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the CAMINO intracranial pressure device in clinical practice.
    Schürer L; Münch E; Piepgras A; Weigel R; Schilling L; Schmiedek P
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1997; 70():296-8. PubMed ID: 9416352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Camino intracranial pressure monitor: prospective study of accuracy and complications.
    Martínez-Mañas RM; Santamarta D; de Campos JM; Ferrer E
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Jul; 69(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 10864608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.