These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1583705)

  • 1. [Multivariate study of auditory perception using multi-electrode cochlear implants].
    Picard M; Ferron P; Rochette C; Meyer F; Bergeron F; Blaney D; Desgagné M
    J Otolaryngol; 1992 Apr; 21(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 1583705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-channel cochlear implant patients with different open speech understanding show some similar basic psychophysical results.
    Cazals Y; Pelizzone M; Kasper A; Montandon P
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():150-5. PubMed ID: 2356721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.
    Colletti L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):943-6. PubMed ID: 17712673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Patients with trauma-induced deafness--rehabilitation using a cochlear implant].
    Mack KF; Kempf HG; Lenarz T
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):249-51. PubMed ID: 9324866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Kishon-Rabin L; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1675-83. PubMed ID: 15955572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic value of round-window psychophysical testing with cochlear-implant candidates.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 23(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 8064955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Early and long-term results of rehabilitation of cochlear implant patients]].
    Aschendorff A; Marangos N; Laszig R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):275-7. PubMed ID: 9280413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of prelingually and perilingually deafened children and adults with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    García JM; Barón de Otero C; García J; Peñaranda A; Niño C; Campos S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Francart T; Scherf F; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Van de Heyning PH; Offeciers FE; De Raeve L; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 19141992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception abilities in children with cochlear implants or hearing aids.
    Somers MN
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():174-8. PubMed ID: 2069178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.
    Vincenti V; Pasanisi E; Guida M; Di Trapani G; Sanna M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.