These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1583705)

  • 21. Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Hochmair ES; Burian K; Fischer RE
    Med Prog Technol; 1981; 8(3):107-19. PubMed ID: 6895542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
    Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What should be implemented in future cochlear implants?
    Tyler RS
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():268-75. PubMed ID: 2356735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is psychological status a determinant of speech perception outcomes in highly selected good adolescent cochlear implant users?
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1415-22. PubMed ID: 17586056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Blink reflex and auditory speech perception in prelingually cochlear-implanted children.
    Emamdjomeh H; Shafaghat L; Abbassalipour P; Hassanzadeh S; Alaeddini F; Farhadi M; Daneshi A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15823805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cochlear implants in children: benefits and concerns.
    Berliner KI; Tonokawa LL; Brown CJ; Dye LM
    Am J Otol; 1988 Dec; 9 Suppl():86-92. PubMed ID: 3202142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
    Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.
    Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Miyamoto RT; Berry SW; Myres WA; Kessler KS; Pope ML
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():105-15. PubMed ID: 2069171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Clinical results of the multielectrode cochlear implant in the rehabilitation of 27 cases of acquired total deafness].
    Fugain C; Chabolle F; Meyer B; Chouard CH
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1988; 105(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 3408097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Rating evaluation of the effect of pre-lingual cochlear implanted's aural/oral rehabilitation by questionnaires].
    Ji F; Xi X; Hong MD; Han DY; Huang DL; Wu WM
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Oct; 39(10):584-8. PubMed ID: 15696914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Stille LJ
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):435-52. PubMed ID: 18344869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Computer-assisted rehabilitation of auditory perception after cochlear implants and hearing aid management].
    Gross M; Herrmann HW
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 8172634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening.
    Cutting JE
    Psychol Rev; 1976 Mar; 83(2):114-40. PubMed ID: 769016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory feedback does not influence random number generation: Evidence from profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implant.
    Strenge H; Müller-Deile J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Aug; 29(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 17691037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech perception in young children using nucleus or Clarion Cochlear Implants: effect of communication mode.
    Young NM; Grohne KM; Carrasco VN; Brown CJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():77-9. PubMed ID: 11141015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.