548 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15838759)
1. [Comparison of a T1-weighted inversion-recovery-, gradient-echo- and spin-echo sequence for imaging of the brain at 3.0 Tesla].
Stehling C; Niederstadt T; Krämer S; Kugel H; Schwindt W; Heindel W; Bachmann R
Rofo; 2005 Apr; 177(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 15838759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted fast spin-echo contrast-enhanced imaging: a comparison in 20 patients with brain lesions.
Al-Saeed O; Ismail M; Athyal RP; Rudwan M; Khafajee S
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 19695043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spin-echo T1-weighted imaging of the brain with interleaved acquisition and presaturation pulse at 3 T: a feasibility study before clinical use.
Kasahara S; Miki Y; Mori N; Urayama S; Kanagaki M; Fushimi Y; Maeda C; Sawamoto N; Fukuyama H; Togashi K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):852-7. PubMed ID: 19375955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MRI for intracranial tumors in comparison with post-contrast T1W spin-echo MRI.
Zhou ZR; Shen TZ; Chen XR; Peng WJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Mar; 119(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 16584644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of T1-weighted fast spin-echo and T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images of the lumbar spine at 3.0 Tesla.
Lavdas E; Vlychou M; Arikidis N; Kapsalaki E; Roka V; Fezoulidis IV
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 20170294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery BLADE magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: an alternative to spin-echo technique for detection of brain lesions in the unsedated pediatric patient?
Alibek S; Adamietz B; Cavallaro A; Stemmer A; Anders K; Kramer M; Bautz W; Staatz G
Acad Radiol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):986-95. PubMed ID: 18620119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. T1-weighted brain imaging with a 32-channel coil at 3T using TurboFLASH BLADE compared with standard cartesian k-space sampling.
Attenberger UI; Runge VM; Williams KD; Stemmer A; Michaely HJ; Schoenberg SO; Reiser MF; Wintersperger BJ
Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 19151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Brain tumor enhancement in MR imaging at 3 Tesla: comparison of SNR and CNR gain using TSE and GRE techniques.
Wintersperger BJ; Runge VM; Biswas J; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Aug; 42(8):558-63. PubMed ID: 17620938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Magnetic resonance of the brain: comparative assessment of conventional sequences versus fast sequences].
Cardone G; Gallucci M; Paluello GB; Gagliardo O; Castrucci M
Radiol Med; 1997 May; 93(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 9280931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.
Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Hoevelborn T; Helber U; Scheule A; Claussen C; Miller S
Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted FLAIR with BLADE, and spin-echo T1-weighted sequences in intracranial MRI.
Alkan O; Kizilkiliç O; Yildirim T; Alibek S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2009 Jun; 15(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 19517375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Renal corticomedullary junction. Performance of T1-weighted MR pulse sequences.
Baumgartner BR; Nelson RC; Torres WE; Malko JA; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME
Invest Radiol; 1989 Nov; 24(11):884-7. PubMed ID: 2807803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER).
Fries P; Runge VM; Kirchin MA; Stemmer A; Naul LG; Wiliams KD; Reith W; Bücker A; Schneider G
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19363447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D MP-RAGE) imaging is superior to spin-echo imaging in delineating brain metastases.
Takeda T; Takeda A; Nagaoka T; Kunieda E; Takemasa K; Watanabe M; Hatou T; Oguro S; Katayama M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1167-73. PubMed ID: 18979271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of three-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and steady-state gradient echo sequences in axial MRI examination of the cervical spine].
Mahmutyazicioğlu K; Ozdemir H; Savranlar A; Ozer T; Erdem O; Erdem Z; Gündoğdu S
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Dec; 9(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 14730951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain tumor enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging: dependency on the level of protein binding of applied contrast agents.
Wintersperger BJ; Runge VM; Tweedle MF; Jackson CB; Reiser MF
Invest Radiol; 2009 Feb; 44(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 19077910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced multi-shot echo-planar FLAIR in the depiction of metastatic tumors of the brain: comparison with contrast-enhanced spin-echo T1-weighted imaging.
Tomura N; Narita K; Takahashi S; Otani T; Sakuma I; Yasuda K; Nishii T; Watarai J
Acta Radiol; 2007 Nov; 48(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 17957522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low dose gadobenate dimeglumine for imaging of chronic myocardial infarction in comparison with standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Bauner KU; Reiser MF; Huber AM
Invest Radiol; 2009 Feb; 44(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 19077911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the benefits of multi-echo EPI for fMRI at 7 T.
Poser BA; Norris DG
Neuroimage; 2009 May; 45(4):1162-72. PubMed ID: 19349231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of vertebral metastases at 0.2 Tesla: clinical evaluation of T1-weighted opposed-phase gradient-echo imaging.
Ohno S; Togami I; Sei T; Ida K; Tsunoda M; Yamaoka K; Kanazawa S; Hiraki Y
Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR; 2003; 35(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 15552725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
