These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15839003)

  • 1. Monsanto v. Schmeiser: patent protection for genetically modified genes and cells in Canada.
    Law GS; Marles JA
    Health Law Rev; 2004; 13(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 15839003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Schmeiser versus Monsanto.
    Sechley K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jul; 22(7):803-4. PubMed ID: 15229531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canadian farmer found guilty of Monsanto canola patent infringement.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 May; 19(5):396-7. PubMed ID: 11328983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monsanto wins seven-year court battle for seed patent.
    Spurgeon D
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6990):330. PubMed ID: 15164024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Monsanto decision: the edge or the wedge.
    Gold ER; Adams WA
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jun; 19(6):587. PubMed ID: 11385467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Canada. Monsanto wins split decision in patent fight over GM crop.
    Kondro W
    Science; 2004 May; 304(5675):1229. PubMed ID: 15166338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patent protection. Canadian drug firms boost R&D spending.
    Spurgeon D
    Nature; 1992 Feb; 355(6362):666. PubMed ID: 1741046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. European patent oppositions and biotechnology.
    Cornish KV
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Aug; 18(8):899-900. PubMed ID: 10932164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Europe edges closer to GMO patent harmonization.
    Spillmann-Fürst I
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Sep; 17(9):842-3. PubMed ID: 10471913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intellectual property. Plants and intellectual property: an international appraisal.
    Koo B; Nottenburg C; Pardey PG
    Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5700):1295-7. PubMed ID: 15550646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monsanto Technology LLC v. Cargill: a matter of construction.
    Cohen S; Morgan G
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 18327235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Europe kills off patents on life.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1995 Mar; 145(1968):7. PubMed ID: 11656408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indian patent law will protect crops 'unless injurious to health'.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6762):566. PubMed ID: 10604445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pharmaceutical patent legislation: a thoughtful and balanced approach.
    Erola J
    Clin Invest Med; 1996 Dec; 19(6):479-81. PubMed ID: 8959358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intellectual property in higher life forms: the patent system and controversial technologies.
    Merges RP
    MD Law Rev; 1988; 47(4):1051-75. PubMed ID: 16514761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supreme Court rules against drug patent "evergreening".
    Kondro W
    CMAJ; 2006 Dec; 175(12):1508-9. PubMed ID: 17146081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patenting plants: what to claim.
    Agris CH
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Jul; 17(7):717-8. PubMed ID: 10409355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Canadian High Court upholds Glaxo Wellcome AZT patent.
    AIDS Policy Law; 2002 Dec; 17(22):3. PubMed ID: 12510642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Handle with care.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7087):990-1. PubMed ID: 16625170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Profit and the patent on life.
    Attali J
    New Perspect Q; 1994; 11(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 15739292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.