239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15839006)
1. University says research subjects' family members are not research subjects too.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Feb; 20(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 15839006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research subject's complaint launches federal investigation.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jan; 18(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12755096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. University failed to have adequate IRB policies and procedures in place.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Mar; 17(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 12408153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. HIPAA and what institutional review boards (IRBs) do not have to review.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Dec; 18(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 15027429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. OPRR issues final findings in its investigation of university.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 May; 15(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 11917931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.
Jansson RL
Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Potential research subject complains about the violation of her privacy.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Oct; 17(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 12731497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. University uses "implied informed consent".
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Mar; 20(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 15856566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The use and disclosure of protected health information for research under the HIPAA privacy rule: unrealized patient autonomy and burdensome government regulation.
Tovino SA
S D Law Rev; 2004; 49(3):447-502. PubMed ID: 16493842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjects must have access to treatment and research records.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):5-6. PubMed ID: 11917939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Protecting human research subjects: ten common problems.
Puglisi T
Health Law News; 2000 Jun; 13(3):8, 15. PubMed ID: 12542046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. University later admits that regulations were not followed.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research administrator should not serve on institutional review board.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Continued concern: human subject protection, the institutional review board, and continuing review.
Hoffman S
Tenn Law Rev; 2001; 68(4):725-70. PubMed ID: 16189912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. So what are we going to do about research using clinical information and samples?
Clayton EW
IRB; 2004; 26(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 15658018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Balancing privacy protections with efficient research: institutional review boards and the use of certificates of confidentiality.
Currie PM
IRB; 2005; 27(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 16425475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]