241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15839119)
1. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study.
Ikumi N; Tsutsumi S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 15839119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short communication: use of a diagnostic software to predict bone density and implant stability in preoperative CTs.
Pagliani L; Motroni A; Nappo A; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):553-7. PubMed ID: 20586783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can we predict the insertion torque using the bone density around the implant?
Wada M; Suganami T; Sogo M; Maeda Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 45(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 26482639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement.
Turkyilmaz I; Tözüm TF; Tumer C; Ozbek EN
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):881-8. PubMed ID: 17168930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: a human cadaver study.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; McGlumphy EA; Tözüm TF
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 18422713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a Novel Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner for Bone Density Examinations in Preoperative 3D Reconstructions and Correlation with Primary Implant Stability.
Sennerby L; Andersson P; Pagliani L; Giani C; Moretti G; Molinari M; Motroni A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):844-53. PubMed ID: 24373386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic methods for predicting insertion torque of dental implants.
Cortes AR; Eimar H; Barbosa Jde S; Costa C; Arita ES; Tamimi F
J Periodontol; 2015 May; 86(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 25594426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
González-García R; Monje F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: treatment of the mandible.
Tardieu PB; Vrielinck L; Escolano E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 12939016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants.
Turkyilmaz I; Tumer C; Ozbek EN; Tözüm TF
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Aug; 34(8):716-22. PubMed ID: 17635248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone density around endosseous implants in patients taking alendronate: a pilot study.
Griffiths GR
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Jun; 32(3):e101-8. PubMed ID: 22408779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.
Ozan O; Orhan K; Turkyilmaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1755-61. PubMed ID: 21959426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
Sarment DP; Sukovic P; Clinthorne N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 12939011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is there a lower threshold value of bone density for early loading protocols of dental implants?
Turkyilmaz I; McGlumphy EA
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):775-81. PubMed ID: 18482347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of resonance frequency analysis method to assess implant stability.
Turkyilmaz I; Company AM
N Y State Dent J; 2011; 77(5):44-9. PubMed ID: 22029115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation Between Implant Geometry, Implant Surface, Insertion Torque, and Primary Stability: In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis.
Falco A; Berardini M; Trisi P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):824-830. PubMed ID: 30024998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adapted preparation technique for screw-type implants: explorative in vitro pilot study in a porcine bone model.
Beer A; Gahleitner A; Holm A; Birkfellner W; Homolka P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 17224030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of cone beam CT-derived bone density parameters with primary implant stability assessed by peak insertion torque and periotest in the maxilla.
Hakim SG; Glanz J; Ofer M; Steller D; Sieg P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):461-467. PubMed ID: 30683621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
