These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15839597)
1. Amblyopia detection by camera: Gateway to portable, inexpensive vision screening (calibration and validation of inexpensive, pocket-sized photoscreeners). Arnold RW; Arnold AW; Stark L; Arnold KK; Leman R; Armitage MD Alaska Med; 2004; 46(3):63-72. PubMed ID: 15839597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tent photoscreening and patched HOTV visual acuity by school nurses: validation of the ASD-ABCD protocol. (Anchorage School District- Alaska Blind Child Discovery program). Arnold RW; Stark L; Leman R; Arnold KK; Armitage MD Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2008; 23(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 18702611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy of photoscreening for amblyopiagenic factors in a high risk population. Enzenauer RW Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 14653776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validated portable pediatric vision screening in the Alaska Bush. A VIPS-like study in the Koyukon. Lang D; Leman R; Arnold AW; Arnold RW Alaska Med; 2007; 49(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 17479731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calibration of photoscreeners for single-subject, contact-induced hyperopic anisometropia. Kovtoun TA; Arnold RW J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2004; 41(3):150-8. PubMed ID: 15206600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive value of inexpensive digital eye and vision photoscreening: "PPV of ABCD". Arnold RW; Clausen M; Ryan H; Leman RE; Armitage D Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2007; 22(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 17983349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors by public health personnel: the Eyecor Camera System. Enzenauer RW; Freeman HL; Larson MR; Williams TL Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 7(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10652167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calibration and validation of the 2WIN photoscreener compared to the PlusoptiX S12 and the SPOT. Kirk S; Armitage MD; Dunn S; Arnold RW J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2014; 51(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 25000209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pediatric eye/vision screening. Referral criteria for the pedia vision plus optix s 04 photoscreener compared to visual acuity and digital photoscreening. Kindergarten computer photoscreening. Clausen MM; Arnold RW Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2007; 22(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 17688416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Alaska Blind Child Discovery project: rationale, methods and results of 4000 screenings. Arnold RW; Gionet EG; Jastrzebski AI; Kovtoun TA; Machida CJ; Armitage MD; Coon LJ Alaska Med; 2000; 42(3):58-72. PubMed ID: 11042938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of patched HOTV visual acuity and photoscreening. Leman R; Clausen MM; Bates J; Stark L; Arnold KK; Arnold RW J Sch Nurs; 2006 Aug; 22(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 16856779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs: IV. Interobserver variability in photograph grading: origin and method of reduction. Kim AH; Chen J; Ottar-Pfeifer W; Lengauer B; Holgado S; Stager DR; Parks MM; Beauchamp GR; Scott W; Marsh MJ; Tong PY Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2005; 20(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 16042536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study. Schmidt P; Maguire M; Dobson V; Quinn G; Ciner E; Cyert L; Kulp MT; Moore B; Orel-Bixler D; Redford M; Ying GS; Ophthalmology; 2004 Apr; 111(4):637-50. PubMed ID: 15051194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reliability of interpretation of photoscreening results with the off PS-100 in Headstart preschool children. Lewis RC; Marsh-Tootle WL J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Jul; 66(7):429-34. PubMed ID: 7560731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating photoscreeners II: MTI and fortune videorefractor. Cooper CD; Gole GA; Hall JE; Colville DJ; Carden SM; Bowling FG Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1999 Dec; 27(6):387-98. PubMed ID: 10641896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between the plusoptiX and MTI Photoscreeners. Matta NS; Arnold RW; Singman EL; Silbert DI Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 127(12):1591-5. PubMed ID: 20008713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nine-year results of a volunteer lay network photoscreening program of 147 809 children using a photoscreener in Iowa. Longmuir SQ; Pfeifer W; Leon A; Olson RJ; Short L; Scott WE Ophthalmology; 2010 Oct; 117(10):1869-75. PubMed ID: 20656350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosis and treatment of refractive errors in the pediatric population. Braverman R Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 18(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 17700230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Major review: The underutilization of vision screening (for amblyopia, optical anomalies and strabismus) among preschool age children. Castanes MS Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(4):217-32. PubMed ID: 14653775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]