BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15839927)

  • 1. A cost comparison of nephron-sparing surgical techniques for renal tumour.
    Lotan Y; Cadeddu JA
    BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1039-42. PubMed ID: 15839927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of costs and morbidity associated with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating small renal tumours.
    Bensalah K; Zeltser I; Tuncel A; Cadeddu J; Lotan Y
    BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 17922853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative financial analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for small renal tumours < or =3.5 cm: a single institutional experience.
    Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Robertson C; Albala D; Walther P; Polascik TJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):715-20; discussion 720-1. PubMed ID: 16904255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses.
    Castle SM; Gorbatiy V; Avallone MA; Eldefrawy A; Caulton DE; Leveillee RJ
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1327-32. PubMed ID: 22361086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience.
    Schiff JD; Palese M; Vaughan ED; Sosa RE; Coll D; Del Pizzo JJ
    BJU Int; 2005 Oct; 96(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 16153207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single institutional cost analysis of 325 robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomies.
    Laydner H; Isac W; Autorino R; Kassab A; Yakoubi R; Hillyer S; Khalifeh A; Campbell SC; Fergany A; Simmons M; Kaouk JH
    Urology; 2013 Mar; 81(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 23295137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
    Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer.
    Heuer R; Gill IS; Guazzoni G; Kirkali Z; Marberger M; Richie JP; de la Rosette JJ
    Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 19853989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Anderson JK; Murdock A; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y
    Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):557-60. PubMed ID: 16140077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does obesity impact the costs of partial and radical nephrectomy?
    Bensalah K; Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Marvin A; Lotan Y
    J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1714-7; discussion 1717-8. PubMed ID: 18343428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy.
    Alemozaffar M; Chang SL; Kacker R; Sun M; DeWolf WC; Wagner AA
    J Endourol; 2013 May; 27(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 23130756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery.
    Van Poppel H
    Int J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):314-26. PubMed ID: 20409229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: cost comparison with analysis of individual parameters.
    Park S; Pearle MS; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y
    J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1449-54. PubMed ID: 18186682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. RENAL nephrometry score is associated with operative approach for partial nephrectomy and urine leak.
    Stroup SP; Palazzi K; Kopp RP; Mehrazin R; Santomauro M; Cohen SA; Patterson AL; L'Esperance JO; Derweesh IH
    Urology; 2012 Jul; 80(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 22748871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery (MINSS) for renal tumours part I: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
    Aron M; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2007 Feb; 51(2):337-46; discussion 46-7. PubMed ID: 17095144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nephron sparing options for the management of small renal masses.
    Chang SL; Cipriano LE; Harshman LC; Garber AM; Chung BI
    J Urol; 2011 May; 185(5):1591-7. PubMed ID: 21419445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost analysis of open, laparoscopic, and percutaneous treatment options for nephron-sparing surgery.
    Link RE; Permpongkosol S; Gupta A; Jarrett TW; Solomon SB; Kavoussi LR
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):782-9. PubMed ID: 17094755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Open partial nephrectomy for complex tumours and >4 cm: Is it still the gold standard technique in the minimally invasive era?
    Van Poppel H; Joniau S; Goethuys H
    Arch Esp Urol; 2013; 66(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 23406808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy: analysis of individual parameters.
    Lotan Y; Duchene DA; Cadeddu JA; Koeneman KS
    J Urol; 2003 Sep; 170(3):752-5. PubMed ID: 12913690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of a prospective study comparing the clinical efficacy of cryoablation of renal cell cancer followed by immediate partial nephrectomy.
    Khoder WY; Siegert S; Stief CG; Becker AJ; Waidelich R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 24139636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.