164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15839937)
1. The use of a newly designed nonabsorbable polymeric stent in reconstructing the vas deferens: a feasibility study in New Zealand white rabbits.
Vrijhof EJ; De Bruine A; Zwinderman AH; Lycklama à Nijeholt AA; Koole LH
BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1081-5. PubMed ID: 15839937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New nonabsorbable stent versus a microsurgical procedure for vasectomy reversal: evaluating tissue reactions at the anastomosis in rabbits.
Vrijhof EJ; de Bruine A; Zwinderman A; Lycklama à Nijeholt AA; Koole L
Fertil Steril; 2005 Sep; 84(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 16169412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of outcomes of vasovasostomy performed in the convoluted and straight vas deferens.
Patel SR; Sigman M
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):256-9. PubMed ID: 18001786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patency following microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy: temporal considerations.
Matthews GJ; Schlegel PN; Goldstein M
J Urol; 1995 Dec; 154(6):2070-3. PubMed ID: 7500460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The kinetics of the return of motile sperm to the ejaculate after vasectomy reversal.
Yang G; Walsh TJ; Shefi S; Turek PJ
J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2272-6. PubMed ID: 17509339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of viscoelastic solution to improve visualization during urologic microsurgery: evaluation of patency after vasovasostomy.
Eisenberg ML; Walsh TJ; Turek PJ
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):134-6. PubMed ID: 18977020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early patency rates after the two-suture invagination technique of vaso-epididymal anastomosis for idiopathic obstruction.
Kumar R; Gautam G; Gupta NP
BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):575-7. PubMed ID: 16469029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vasovasostomy in the convoluted vas deferens: indications and outcomes.
Sandlow JI; Kolettis PN
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):540-2. PubMed ID: 15643242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A polymeric mini-stent designed to facilitate the vasectomy reversal operation. A rabbit model study.
Vrijhof EJ; de Bruïne A; Lycklama à Nijeholt AA; Koole LH
Biomaterials; 2004 Feb; 25(4):729-34. PubMed ID: 14607512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
McCallum S; Li PS; Sheynkin Y; Su LM; Chan P; Goldstein M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2284-8. PubMed ID: 11956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between intravasal sperm quality and patency rates after vasovasostomy.
Sigman M
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):307-9. PubMed ID: 14665901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vasovasostomy-microscopy versus macroscopic techniques.
Fenster H; McLoughlin MG
Arch Androl; 1981 Sep; 7(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 7283530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vasectomy and vasovasostomy. II. A comparison of two methods of vasovasostomy: silastic versus chromic stents.
Urry RL; Thompson J; Cockett AT
Fertil Steril; 1976 Aug; 27(8):945-50. PubMed ID: 955137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pelviscrotal vasovasostomy: refining and troubleshooting.
Shaeer OK; Shaeer KZ
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1935-7. PubMed ID: 16217349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microsurgical vasovasostomy after failed vasovasostomy.
Paick JS; Park JY; Park DW; Park K; Son H; Kim SW
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):1052-5. PubMed ID: 12576844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microsurgical reconstruction of iatrogenic injuries to the epididymis from hydrocelectomy.
Hopps CV; Goldstein M
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2077-9; discussion 2080. PubMed ID: 17070262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contraception with danazol plus testosterone enanthate in the rabbit. I. Effects on vas deferens.
Lohiya NK; Sharma RC
Acta Eur Fertil; 1983; 14(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 6673445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patency following vasectomy reversal. Temporal and immunological considerations.
Amarin ZO; Obeidat BR
Saudi Med J; 2005 Aug; 26(8):1208-11. PubMed ID: 16127514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prosthetic vas deferens.
Brueschke EE; Maness JH; Zaneveld LJ; Rodzen R; Wingfield JR
Biomed Eng; 1976 Sep; 11(9):314-8. PubMed ID: 974217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microsurgical anastomosis of vas deferens: an experimental study in the rat.
Hampel N; Earle AS; Kursh ED; Persky L
Invest Urol; 1978 Mar; 15(5):395-6. PubMed ID: 346521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
