These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15840177)

  • 1. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample.
    Hozo SP; Djulbegovic B; Hozo I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Apr; 5():13. PubMed ID: 15840177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range.
    Wan X; Wang W; Liu J; Tong T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():135. PubMed ID: 25524443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power and sample size calculation incorporating misspecifications of the variance function in comparative clinical trials with over-dispersed count data.
    Igeta M; Takahashi K; Matsui S
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1459-1467. PubMed ID: 29579337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blinded sample size re-estimation in three-arm trials with 'gold standard' design.
    Mütze T; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3636-3653. PubMed ID: 28608469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size re-estimation incorporating prior information on a nuisance parameter.
    Mütze T; Schmidli H; Friede T
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Mar; 17(2):126-143. PubMed ID: 29181869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary.
    Shi J; Luo D; Weng H; Zeng XT; Lin L; Chu H; Tong T
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep; 11(5):641-654. PubMed ID: 32562361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the sample variance from the sample size and range.
    Rychtář J; T Taylor D
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(30):4667-4686. PubMed ID: 32935391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.
    Waksman JA
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design for sample size re-estimation with interim data for double-blind clinical trials with binary outcomes.
    Shih WJ; Zhao PL
    Stat Med; 1997 Sep; 16(17):1913-23. PubMed ID: 9304763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method to estimate the variance of an endpoint from an on-going blinded trial.
    Xing B; Ganju J
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1807-14. PubMed ID: 15803440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis and the reversed Theorem of the Means.
    Edwardes MD
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 26052955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Sample Size by Bootstrap and by Formulas Based on Normal Distribution Assumption.
    Wang Z
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Mar; 53(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 29807472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of the difference of medians.
    McGrath S; Sohn H; Steele R; Benedetti A
    Biom J; 2020 Jan; 62(1):69-98. PubMed ID: 31553488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-estimating the sample size of an on-going blinded trial based on the method of randomization block sums.
    Ganju J; Xing B
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 18837073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating Standardized Effect Sizes for Two- and Three-Level Partially Nested Data.
    Lai MH; Kwok OM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):740-756. PubMed ID: 27802077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size calculations for comparing two groups of count data.
    Wang L; Fan C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 30024833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size calculation for comparing two negative binomial rates.
    Zhu H; Lakkis H
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):376-87. PubMed ID: 24038204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculation for clinical trials with correlated count measurements based on the negative binomial distribution.
    Li D; Zhang S; Cao J
    Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5413-5427. PubMed ID: 31652010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 64.