These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1584035)

  • 1. Parameter estimation by least-squares methods.
    Johnson ML; Faunt LM
    Methods Enzymol; 1992; 210():1-37. PubMed ID: 1584035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MC-Fit: using Monte-Carlo methods to get accurate confidence limits on enzyme parameters.
    Dardel F
    Comput Appl Biosci; 1994 Jun; 10(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 7922682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
    Nestler S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy in parameter estimation for targeted effects in structural equation modeling: sample size planning for narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Jun; 16(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 21417531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast parametric imaging algorithm for dual-input biomedical system parameter estimation.
    Choi HC; Chen S; Feng D; Wong KP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16376452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo generation of SB and SU distributions.
    Reed JF; Stark DB
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1995 Jul; 47(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 7587162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo method for determining complete confidence probability distributions of estimated model parameters.
    Straume M; Johnson ML
    Methods Enzymol; 1992; 210():117-29. PubMed ID: 1584037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to fit a response time distribution.
    Van Zandt T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):424-65. PubMed ID: 11082851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The least-squares analysis of data from binding and enzyme kinetics studies weights, bias, and confidence intervals in usual and unusual situations.
    Tellinghuisen J
    Methods Enzymol; 2009; 467():499-529. PubMed ID: 19897105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dunnett's many-to-one test and least square means.
    Shun Z; Silverberg A; Chang CK; Ouyang P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 12635900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stupid statistics!
    Tellinghuisen J
    Methods Cell Biol; 2008; 84():739-80. PubMed ID: 17964948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence intervals for measures of interaction.
    Assmann SF; Hosmer DW; Lemeshow S; Mundt KA
    Epidemiology; 1996 May; 7(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 8728443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Error estimates for results of nonstationary noise analysis derived with linear least squares methods.
    Steffan R; Heinemann SH
    J Neurosci Methods; 1997 Dec; 78(1-2):51-63. PubMed ID: 9497001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding statistical hypothesis tests and power.
    Jones MP; Beath A; Oldmeadow C; Attia JR
    Med J Aust; 2017 Aug; 207(4):148-150. PubMed ID: 28814212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical inference for the within-device precision of quantitative measurements in assay validation.
    Liu JP; Lu LT; Liao CT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):763-78. PubMed ID: 20183442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical evaluation of several methods for cut-point determination of immunogenicity screening assay.
    Shen M; Dong X; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 25356783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: statistical representation of parameter uncertainty.
    Briggs A
    Value Health; 2005; 8(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15841888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Four applications of permutation methods to testing a single-mediator model.
    Taylor AB; MacKinnon DP
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):806-44. PubMed ID: 22311738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical estimation & inference of cell counts from ELISPOT limiting dilution assays.
    Yang H; Topham DJ; Holden-Wiltse J; Wu H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):921-36. PubMed ID: 23786336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.