154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15840623)
1. Is primary angioplasty more effective than prehospital fibrinolysis in diabetics with acute myocardial infarction? Data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial.
Bonnefoy E; Steg PG; Chabaud S; Dubien PY; Lapostolle F; Boudet F; Lacroute JM; Dissait F; Vanzetto G; Leizorowicz A; Touboul P
Eur Heart J; 2005 Sep; 26(17):1712-8. PubMed ID: 15840623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction (CAPTIM) trial: a 5-year follow-up.
Bonnefoy E; Steg PG; Boutitie F; Dubien PY; Lapostolle F; Roncalli J; Dissait F; Vanzetto G; Leizorowicz A; Kirkorian G; ; Mercier C; McFadden EP; Touboul P
Eur Heart J; 2009 Jul; 30(13):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19429632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with fibrinolysis for myocardial infarction in diabetes mellitus: results from the Primary Coronary Angioplasty vs Thrombolysis-2 trial.
Timmer JR; Ottervanger JP; de Boer MJ; Boersma E; Grines CL; Westerhout CM; Simes RJ; Granger CB; Zijlstra F;
Arch Intern Med; 2007 Jul; 167(13):1353-9. PubMed ID: 17620527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence and prognostic implications of ST-segment deviations from ambulatory Holter monitoring after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with either fibrinolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (a Danish Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 Substudy).
Idorn L; Høfsten DE; Wachtell K; Mølgaard H; Egstrup K;
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 100(6):937-43. PubMed ID: 17826373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial.
Steg PG; Bonnefoy E; Chabaud S; Lapostolle F; Dubien PY; Cristofini P; Leizorovicz A; Touboul P;
Circulation; 2003 Dec; 108(23):2851-6. PubMed ID: 14623806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.
Kunadian B; Vijayalakshmi K; Dunning J; Thornley AR; Sutton AG; Muir DF; Wright RA; Hall JA; de Belder MA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 May; 19(5):217-23. PubMed ID: 17476036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Danish multicentre randomized study of fibrinolytic therapy vs. primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (the DANAMI-2 trial): outcome after 3 years follow-up.
Busk M; Maeng M; Rasmussen K; Kelbaek H; Thayssen P; Abildgaard U; Vigholt E; Mortensen LS; Thuesen L; Kristensen SD; Nielsen TT; Andersen HR;
Eur Heart J; 2008 May; 29(10):1259-66. PubMed ID: 17956874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary coronary intervention in diabetic octogenarians with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Sosnowski C; Janeczko-Sosnowska E; Woźniak J; Jasiński B; Dabrowski R; Sumiński A; Wiernikowski A; Ostrzycki A; Szwed H; Ruzyłło W
Kardiol Pol; 2007 Oct; 65(10):1181-6; discussion 1187-9. PubMed ID: 17979046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Percutaneous coronary intervention-related time delay, patient's risk profile, and survival benefits of primary angioplasty vs lytic therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
De Luca G; Cassetti E; Marino P
Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Jul; 27(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 19751630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical characteristics and outcome of diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. Data from the BLITZ-1 study.
Casella G; Savonitto S; Chiarella F; Gonzini L; Di Chiara A; Bolognese L; De Servi S; Greco C; Zonzin P; Coccolini S; Maggioni AP; Boccanelli A;
Ital Heart J; 2005 May; 6(5):374-83. PubMed ID: 15934409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary angioplasty is cost-minimizing compared with pre-hospital thrombolysis for patients within 60 min of a percutaneous coronary intervention center: the Comparison of Angioplasty and Pre-hospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) cost-efficacy sub-study.
Machecourt J; Bonnefoy E; Vanzetto G; Motreff P; Marlière S; Leizorovicz A; Allenet B; Lacroute JM; Cassagnes J; Touboul P
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Feb; 45(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 15708697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals.
Coleman CI; McKay RG; Boden WE; Mather JF; White CM
Clin Ther; 2006 Jul; 28(7):1054-62. PubMed ID: 16990084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing physician versus patient transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Zhang Q; Zhang RY; Qiu JP; Zhang JF; Wang XL; Jiang L; Liao ML; Zhang JS; Hu J; Yang ZK; Shen WF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Mar; 121(6):485-91. PubMed ID: 18364130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study.
Widimský P; Groch L; Zelízko M; Aschermann M; Bednár F; Suryapranata H
Eur Heart J; 2000 May; 21(10):823-31. PubMed ID: 10781354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of pre-hospital combination-fibrinolysis plus conventional care with pre-hospital combination-fibrinolysis plus facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction.
Thiele H; Engelmann L; Elsner K; Kappl MJ; Storch WH; Rahimi K; Hartmann A; Pfeiffer D; Kneissl GD; Schneider D; Möller T; Heberling HJ; Weise I; Schuler G;
Eur Heart J; 2005 Oct; 26(19):1956-63. PubMed ID: 16061501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rheolytic thrombectomy with percutaneous coronary intervention for infarct size reduction in acute myocardial infarction: 30-day results from a multicenter randomized study.
Ali A; Cox D; Dib N; Brodie B; Berman D; Gupta N; Browne K; Iwaoka R; Azrin M; Stapleton D; Setum C; Popma J;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jul; 48(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 16843170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of primary coronary angioplasty on long-term prognosis in patients with diabetes mellitus].
Simek S; Aschermann M; Holm F; Humhal J; Linhart A; Psenicka M; Rohác J; Reznícek V; Kovárník T; Mrázek V
Vnitr Lek; 2004 Feb; 50(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 15077586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Procedural characteristics of primary coronary angioplasty in diabetic patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction.
Bonnevie L; Stratiev V; Tarragano F; Karillon G; Saïdi A; Fressonnet R; Azancot I; Beaufils P; Henry P
Diabetes Metab; 2002 Nov; 28(5):405-10. PubMed ID: 12461478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does diabetes mellitus abolish the beneficial effect of primary coronary angioplasty on long-term risk of reinfarction after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with fibrinolysis? (A DANAMI-2 substudy).
Madsen MM; Busk M; Søndergaard HM; Bøttcher M; Mortensen LS; Andersen HR; Nielsen TT;
Am J Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 96(11):1469-75. PubMed ID: 16310424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence and prognostic implications of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after revascularization with either fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty.
Høfsten DE; Wachtell K; Lund B; Mølgaard H; Egstrup K
Eur Heart J; 2007 Feb; 28(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 17227787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
