295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15841382)
1. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI.
Morakkabati-Spitz N; Leutner C; Schild H; Traeber F; Kuhl C
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):2010-7. PubMed ID: 15841382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Evaluation of main presentations on magnetic resonance imaging compared with findings on mammogram and histology.
Badan GM; Roveda D; Paito S; Fleury Ede F; Maragno B; Campos MS; Ferreira CA; Ferreira FA
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2016; 62(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 27656851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ductal pattern enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging of the breast due to ductal lavage.
Ghanouni P; Kurian AW; Margolis D; Hartman AR; Mills MA; Plevritis SK; Ford JM; Daniel BL
Breast J; 2007; 13(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17461903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ.
Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Copit DS; Evans WP; Savino DA; Krakos PA; Farrell RS; Flamig DP
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 8888235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study.
Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; De Felice C; Meggiorini ML; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM
Radiol Med; 2008 Mar; 113(2):249-64. PubMed ID: 18386126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI-guided quadrantectomy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ detected preoperatively by mammographic calcifications.
Sakakibara M; Yokomizo J; Shiina N; Kazama T; Nakamura R; Fujimoto H; Nagashima T; Takishima H; Nakatani Y; Miyazaki M
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Aug; 219(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 24880957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI in mammographically detected BI-RADS 5 microcalcifications.
Houserkova D; Prasad SN; Svach I; Kucerova L; Duskova M; Bucil J; Sisola I; Zlamalova N; Svebisova H
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2008 Jun; 152(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 18795084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as B1-RADS 3].
Obenauer S; Fischer U; Baum F; Dammert S; Füzesi L; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11570238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [MRI outstands mammogram in sensitivity of breast ductal carcinoma in situ:an analysis of 122 cases].
Yu QX; Chen XS; Wu JY; Han BS; He JR; Zhu L; Chen WG; Li YF; Tan L; Chai WM; Wang DB; Fei XC; Yuan F; Jin XL; Shen KW; Li HW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 23578423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI.
Gilles R; Meunier M; Lucidarme O; Zafrani B; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Le Gal M; Vanel D; Neuenschwander S; Arriagada R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8576489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast MRI wire-guided excisional biopsy: specimen size as compared to mammogram wire-guided excisional biopsy and implications for use.
Javid SH; Carlson JW; Garber JE; Birdwell RL; Lester S; Lipsitz S; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):3352-8. PubMed ID: 17849165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Added Value of Breast MRI for Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Diagnostic Performance on 362 Patients.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Petrillo M; Triunfo F; Filice S; Vallone P; Setola SV; Rubulotta M; Di Bonito M; Rinaldo M; D'Aiuto M; Brunetti A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(3):e127-e134. PubMed ID: 28111130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limited value of scintimammography and contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of microcalcification detected by mammography.
Tiling R; Khalkhali I; Sommer H; Linke R; Moser R; Willemsen F; Pfluger T; Tatsch K; Hahn K
Nucl Med Commun; 1998 Jan; 19(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 9515547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
