172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15841384)
1. Reproducibility of image interpretation in MRI of the prostate: application of the sextant framework by two different radiologists.
Mueller-Lisse U; Mueller-Lisse U; Scheidler J; Klein G; Reiser M
Eur Radiol; 2005 Sep; 15(9):1826-33. PubMed ID: 15841384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Per-sextant localization and staging of prostate cancer: correlation of imaging findings with whole-mount step section histopathology.
Graser A; Heuck A; Sommer B; Massmann J; Scheidler J; Reiser M; Mueller-Lisse U
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 17179349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of integrated PET/MRI for detection and localization of prostate cancer: Comparative study of multiparametric MRI and PET/CT.
Lee MS; Cho JY; Kim SY; Cheon GJ; Moon MH; Oh S; Lee J; Lee S; Woo S; Kim SH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):597-609. PubMed ID: 27586519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient metrics as a marker of percentage Gleason 4 component within Gleason 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Rosenkrantz AB; Triolo MJ; Melamed J; Rusinek H; Taneja SS; Deng FM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Mar; 41(3):708-14. PubMed ID: 24616064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].
Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy.
Reisæter LA; Fütterer JJ; Halvorsen OJ; Nygård Y; Biermann M; Andersen E; Gravdal K; Haukaas S; Monssen JA; Huisman HJ; Akslen LA; Beisland C; Rørvik J
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 24819231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DCE-MRI of the prostate using shutter-speed vs. Tofts model for tumor characterization and assessment of aggressiveness.
Hectors SJ; Besa C; Wagner M; Jajamovich GH; Haines GK; Lewis S; Tewari A; Rastinehad A; Huang W; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):837-849. PubMed ID: 28092414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new sign for detection of extracapsular extension of prostatic adenocarcinoma: sum of positive sextants per lobe combining interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging and prostate biopsy results.
Luyckx F; Hallouin P; Barré C; Aillet G; Chauveau P; Hétet JF; Bouchot O; Rigaud J
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2013 Sep; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 23830963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of two scoring systems.
Lin WC; Muglia VF; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Westphalen AC
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20151056. PubMed ID: 27007818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance comparison of 1.5-T endorectal coil MRI with 3.0-T nonendorectal coil MRI in patients with prostate cancer.
Shah ZK; Elias SN; Abaza R; Zynger DL; DeRenne LA; Knopp MV; Guo B; Schurr R; Heymsfield SB; Jia G
Acad Radiol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 25579637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the local staging of prostate cancer.
Otto J; Thörmer G; Seiwerts M; Fuchs J; Garnov N; Franz T; Horn LC; Do MH; Stolzenburg JU; Kahn T; Moche M; Busse H
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):795-802. PubMed ID: 24557601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of suspected soft tissue lesion in the prostate bed after radical prostatectomy using 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Cha D; Kim CK; Park SY; Park JJ; Park BK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 33(4):407-12. PubMed ID: 25527395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.
Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Jager GJ; Hartman RP; King BF; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 17024497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Preoperative endorectal MRI in prostate cancer: a monocentric retrospective cohort].
de Vendin C; Eydant Y; Ecochard R; Lorin S; Lacroix B; Lardon R; Mottet N
Prog Urol; 2013 Dec; 23(16):1412-8. PubMed ID: 24274946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [MRI staging of prostate cancer with the combined endorectal body phased-array coil and histologic correlation].
Pegios W; Bentas W; Wittmann L; Mack MG; Zangos S; Söllner O; Binder J; Fellbaum C; Jonas D; Vogl TJ
Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1660-6. PubMed ID: 14661137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A standardized method to measure the membranous urethral length (MUL) on MRI of the prostate with high inter- and intra-observer agreement.
Veerman H; Hagens MJ; Hoeks CM; van der Poel HG; van Leeuwen PJ; Vis AN; Heijmink SWTJP; Schoots IG; de Haan MC; Boellaard TN
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3295-3302. PubMed ID: 36512044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.
Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
