151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15841573)
21. In response to: Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the first year of life.
Bosslet G; Helft PR
J Perinatol; 2009 Apr; 29(4):327-8; author reply 328-9. PubMed ID: 19325556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The right to die and substituted judgment in Texas.
Hill D
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1983 Nov; 5(9):7-37. PubMed ID: 10263562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Legislating advance directives for the terminally ill: the living will and durable power of attorney.
Martyn SR; Jacobs LB
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):779-809. PubMed ID: 16041874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Right to die legislation: an experience to be avoided in Canada?
Somfai B
CHAC Rev; 1983 Jun; 11(2):8-13. PubMed ID: 10263131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
Hunt WE
Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. End-of-life care in Texas.
Rushing ML
Trustee; 1999; 52(10):7. PubMed ID: 10662056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Revising Iowa's Life-sustaining Procedures Act: creating a practical guide to living wills in Iowa.
Goldman CP
Iowa Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 76(5):1137-78. PubMed ID: 16134268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Doctors fail to get life support withdrawn from "minimally conscious" patient.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f6366. PubMed ID: 24144974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Terminal care, advanced directives, patient autonomy: regulation should eliminate inconsistencies in the current legal status].
Weber M
Pflege Z; 2008 Apr; 61(4):206-9. PubMed ID: 18481702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The end of care.
Harris CE
First Things; 2004 Dec; (148):6-7; author reply 7-8. PubMed ID: 16317837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Ethical criteria of terminating treatment].
Birnbacher D
Zentralbl Chir; 1994; 119(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 8178588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment.
Ouellette AR
Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [The case of a cerebral-damaged 3-year-old boy is finished. The National Board of Health and Welfare criticizes 3 physicians--promises advice on the interruption of life support therapy].
Lakartidningen; 1989 Jan; 86(4):250-1. PubMed ID: 2492362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
Brindisi TJ
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Nursing home patients: can feeding tubes be withheld?
Paine CJ
J La State Med Soc; 1996 Jul; 148(7):284. PubMed ID: 8816020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medical futility and life-sustaining treatment decisions.
Weber LJ; Campbell ML
J Neurosci Nurs; 1996 Feb; 28(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 8690963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How far is enough in the intensive care unit?
Lee KH
Singapore Med J; 1995 Dec; 36(6):583-5. PubMed ID: 8781625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Disputes about the withdrawal of treatment: the role of the courts.
Skene L
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 15807358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. When parents request seemingly futile treatment for their children.
Lantos J
Mt Sinai J Med; 2006 May; 73(3):587-9. PubMed ID: 16758094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
