These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15841822)
1. Reliability of non-verbal laterality effects in the visual modality. Voyer D Laterality; 2005 Jan; 10(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 15841822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and magnitude of visual laterality effects: the influence of attention. Voyer D Laterality; 2001 Oct; 6(4):315-36. PubMed ID: 15513179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of laterality effects in a dichotic listening task with nonverbal material. Voyer D; Rodgers MA Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):602-6. PubMed ID: 12030515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the reliability of laterality effects in a dichotic emotion recognition task. Voyer D; Russell A; McKenna J J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 Aug; 24(5):605-14. PubMed ID: 12187444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and magnitude of auditory laterality effects: the influence of attention. Voyer D; Flight JI Brain Cogn; 2001 Aug; 46(3):397-413. PubMed ID: 11487289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and magnitude of visual laterality effects: further examination of the endogenous cueing procedure. Voyer D Laterality; 2003 Jan; 8(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 15513213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of laterality effects in a dichotic listening task with words and syllables. Russell NL; Voyer D Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 15050791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masking and visual field effects on a lateralized rod-and-frame test. Voyer D; Bryden MP Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Mar; 47(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 8481710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the interdependency between attentional biases and visual field effects with bilateral presentations of stimuli. Lupien S; Lafrance MS; Lecours AR Brain Cogn; 1993 Mar; 21(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 8442932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fixation and attention control in lateralised target detection and free recall with words. Voyer D; Boles DB Laterality; 2007 Sep; 12(5):428-48. PubMed ID: 17712713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The contribution of attention to the right visual field advantage for word recognition. Nicholls ME; Wood AG Brain Cogn; 1998 Dec; 38(3):339-57. PubMed ID: 9841790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits. Poynter W; Ingram P; Minor S Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19931966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attention, reliability, and validity of perceptual asymmetries in the fused dichotic words test. Voyer D; Ingram JD Laterality; 2005 Nov; 10(6):545-61. PubMed ID: 16298885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity. Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of a dichotic consonant-vowel pairs task using an ABX procedure. Voyer D; Flight J Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):417-21. PubMed ID: 10857738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]