These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15842022)

  • 1. Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 47(6):1454-68. PubMed ID: 15842022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays.
    Storkel HL; Maekawa J; Hoover JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):933-49. PubMed ID: 20543024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Adults' Word Learning in Noisy Conditions.
    Han MK; Storkel HL; Lee J; Cox C
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):547-560. PubMed ID: 27788276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of incremental changes in phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children.
    Storkel HL; Bontempo DE; Aschenbrenner AJ; Maekawa J; Lee SY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1689-700. PubMed ID: 23882005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English.
    Storkel HL; Hoover JR
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):497-506. PubMed ID: 20479181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying nonwords: effects of lexical neighborhoods, phonotactic probability, and listener characteristics.
    Janse E; Newman RS
    Lang Speech; 2013 Dec; 56(Pt 4):421-41. PubMed ID: 24597272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.
    Storkel HL; Armbrüster J; Hogan TP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1175-92. PubMed ID: 17197489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding Bilingual Word Learning: The Role of Phonotactic Probability and Phonological Neighborhood Density.
    Nair VK; Biedermann B; Nickels L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3551-3560. PubMed ID: 29114764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in the influence of phonological characteristics on expressive vocabulary development by young children.
    Maekawa J; Storkel HL
    J Child Lang; 2006 Aug; 33(3):439-59. PubMed ID: 17017275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A corpus of consonant-vowel-consonant real words and nonwords: comparison of phonotactic probability, neighborhood density, and consonant age of acquisition.
    Storkel HL
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):1159-67. PubMed ID: 23307574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary.
    Storkel HL; Hoover JR
    J Child Lang; 2011 Jun; 38(3):628-43. PubMed ID: 20609282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment.
    Gray S; Pittman A; Weinhold J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):1011-25. PubMed ID: 24686926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words.
    Vitevitch MS; Luce PA; Pisoni DB; Auer ET
    Brain Lang; 1999 Jun 1-15; 68(1-2):306-11. PubMed ID: 10433774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of phonotactic probability/neighbourhood density on lexical learning in late talkers.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Schwartz RG; Shafer VL; Marton K
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 23472958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter.
    Anderson JD; Byrd CT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):851-66. PubMed ID: 18658056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early effects of neighborhood density and phonotactic probability of spoken words on event-related potentials.
    Hunter CR
    Brain Lang; 2013 Dec; 127(3):463-74. PubMed ID: 24129200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1194-212. PubMed ID: 15603471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lexical and phonological effects in early word production.
    Sosa AV; Stoel-Gammon C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):596-608. PubMed ID: 22207699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phonotactic probabilities at the onset of language development: speech production and word position.
    Zamuner TS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 18723600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of word characteristics on the vocabulary of children with cochlear implants.
    Han MK; Storkel HL; Lee J; Yoshinaga-Itano C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2015 Jul; 20(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 25802320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.