These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15842022)

  • 21. The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment.
    Munson B; Kurtz BA; Windsor J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1033-47. PubMed ID: 16411794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Phonotactic probabilities in young children's speech production.
    Zamuner TS; Gerken L; Hammond M
    J Child Lang; 2004 Aug; 31(3):515-36. PubMed ID: 15612388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1321-37. PubMed ID: 11776368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is the time course of lexical activation and competition in spoken word recognition affected by adult aging? An event-related potential (ERP) study.
    Hunter CR
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():451-464. PubMed ID: 27616158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Influence of Phonotactic Probability on Nonword Repetition and Fast Mapping in 3-Year-Olds With a History of Expressive Language Delay.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Dalton KP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1773-9. PubMed ID: 26540310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.
    Vitevitch MS; Armbruster J; Chu S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):514-29. PubMed ID: 14979821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.
    Storkel HL; Hoover JR
    J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):105-19. PubMed ID: 20004908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.
    Luce PA; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 1998 Feb; 19(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 9504270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Independent Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Lexical Acquisition by Preschool Children.
    Storkel HL; Lee SY
    Lang Cogn Process; 2011; 26(2):191-211. PubMed ID: 21643455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size.
    Graf Estes K; Gluck SC; Grimm KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():34-49. PubMed ID: 26905502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of Vocabulary and Phonotactic Probability on 2-Year-Olds' Nonword Repetition.
    Verhagen J; de Bree E; Mulder H; Leseman P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Jun; 46(3):507-524. PubMed ID: 27612854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Dec; 46(6):1312-23. PubMed ID: 14700357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on children's production of newly learned words.
    Heisler L; Goffman L
    Lang Learn Dev; 2016; 12(3):338-356. PubMed ID: 27284274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Word recognition and nonword repetition in children with language disorders: the effects of neighborhood density, lexical frequency, and phonotactic probability.
    Rispens J; Baker A; Duinmeijer I
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 25421294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants.
    Mattys SL; Jusczyk PW
    Cognition; 2001 Feb; 78(2):91-121. PubMed ID: 11074247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lexical and phonological organization in children: evidence from repetition tasks.
    Munson B; Swenson CL; Manthei SC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):108-24. PubMed ID: 15938063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phonological neighborhood effect in spontaneous speech in adults who stutter.
    Tsai PT
    J Fluency Disord; 2018 Dec; 58():86-93. PubMed ID: 30180994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Imageability and Neighborhood Density Facilitate the Age of Word Acquisition in Czech.
    Smolík F
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 May; 62(5):1403-1415. PubMed ID: 31046539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Phonological neighborhood and word frequency effects in the stuttered disfluencies of children who stutter.
    Anderson JD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 50(1):229-47. PubMed ID: 17344561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.