172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15842124)
1. Molloy v Meier and the expanding standard of medical care: implications for public health policy and practice.
Burke T; Rosenbaum S
Public Health Rep; 2005; 120(2):209-10. PubMed ID: 15842124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Molloy v. Meier.
Minnesota. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 2003; 660():444-58. PubMed ID: 16285107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal Challenges in Genetics, Including Duty to Warn and Genetic Discrimination.
Suter S
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2020 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 31548231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A majority of parents accept newborn screening for fragile X.
Levenson D
Am J Med Genet A; 2011 Sep; 155A(9):viii-ix. PubMed ID: 21853527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Duty of care owed to parents of child with genetic disorder.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2005 Jan; 22(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 15666554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A $10 million allergy case. Could it happen to you?
Rice B
Med Econ; 2002 Jun; 79(11):36-8. PubMed ID: 12096596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physicians' legal duties regarding the use of genetic tests to predict and diagnose Alzheimer disease.
Kapp MB
J Leg Med; 2000 Dec; 21(4):445-75. PubMed ID: 11194569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician's duty to warn third parties about the risk of genetic diseases.
McAbee GN; Sherman J; Davidoff-Feldman B
Pediatrics; 1998 Jul; 102(1 Pt 1):140-2. PubMed ID: 9714638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Misuse of genetic information: the common law and professionals' liability.
Partlett DF
Washburn Law J; 2003; 42(3):489-523. PubMed ID: 15112711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The limits of the physician's secrecy duty in risk situations. Special reference to genetics].
Gómez Rivero Mdel C
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2007; (26):43-89. PubMed ID: 18201038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic test results and the duty to disclose: can medical researchers control liability?
Furman RL
Seattle Univ Law Rev; 1999; 23(2):391-429. PubMed ID: 12449928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Should doctors have a legal duty to warn relatives of their genetic risks?
Middleton A; Milne R; Robarts L; Roberts J; Patch C
Lancet; 2019 Dec; 394(10215):2133-2135. PubMed ID: 31784025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Keeping genetic secrets.
Glantz LH
Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2004; 11(1):4, 11. PubMed ID: 15915578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The trouble with paediatricians.
Williams C
Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):389-416. PubMed ID: 20739437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Duty to warn third parties: Bradshaw v. Daniel.
Kennedy I
Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 12159832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal liability in genetic screening genetic counseling, and prenatal diagnosis.
Wright EE; Shaw MW
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Dec; 24(4):1133-49. PubMed ID: 7037253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Newborn screening: ethical, legal, and social implications.
Anderson R; Rothwell E; Botkin JR
Annu Rev Nurs Res; 2011; 29():113-32. PubMed ID: 22891501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Duty to warn of genetic harm in breach of patient confidentiality.
Keeling SL
J Law Med; 2004 Nov; 12(2):235-53. PubMed ID: 15575325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Newborn screening policy in the United Kingdom & the United States: two different communities of practice.
Patch C
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2006; 31(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 16679957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: a legal perspective.
Sharpe NF
Am J Med Genet; 1994 Apr; 50(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 8042666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
