499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15842269)
1. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a biodegradable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession. A 6-year follow-up study.
Leknes KN; Amarante ES; Price DE; Bøe OE; Skavland RJ; Lie T
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):518-29. PubMed ID: 15842269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Amarante ES; Leknes KN; Skavland J; Lie T
J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 10914803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Healing of gingival recessions using a collagen membrane with a hemineralized xenograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cardaropoli D; Cardaropoli G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Feb; 29(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 19244883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage.
Pourabbas R; Chitsazi MT; Kosarieh E; Olyaee P
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19884716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.
Ito K; Oshio K; Shiomi N; Murai S
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 11203942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coronally advanced flap: a modified surgical approach for isolated recession-type defects: three-year results.
de Sanctis M; Zucchelli G
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Mar; 34(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 17309597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Root coverage: comparison of coronally positioned flap with and without titanium-reinforced barrier membrane.
Lins LH; de Lima AF; Sallum AW
J Periodontol; 2003 Feb; 74(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 12666704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of a modified coronally advanced flap alone or in combination with a platelet-rich fibrin membrane for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions: a 6-month study.
Aroca S; Keglevich T; Barbieri B; Gera I; Etienne D
J Periodontol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 19186964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of gingival recessions by guided tissue regeneration and coronally advanced flap.
Banihashemrad A; Aghassizadeh E; Radvar M
N Y State Dent J; 2009 Jan; 75(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 19280831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report.
Spahr A; Haegewald S; Tsoulfidou F; Rompola E; Heijl L; Bernimoulin JP; Ring C; Sander S; Haller B
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1871-80. PubMed ID: 16274306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of gingival recession using a collagen membrane with or without the use of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft for space maintenance.
Kimble KM; Eber RM; Soehren S; Shyr Y; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Feb; 75(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 15068108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcome following treatment of multiple Miller class I and II recession defects in esthetic areas of the mouth.
Zucchelli G; De Sanctis M
J Periodontol; 2005 Dec; 76(12):2286-92. PubMed ID: 16332241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft.
de Queiroz Côrtes A; Sallum AW; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum EA
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Sep; 33(9):683-9. PubMed ID: 16856894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and clinical evaluation of a root coverage procedure using a collagen barrier membrane.
Shieh AT; Wang HL; O'Neal R; Glickman GN; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 1997 Aug; 68(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 9287069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects.
Zucchelli G; Clauser C; De Sanctis M; Calandriello M
J Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 69(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 9526912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation.
Pilloni A; Paolantonio M; Camargo PM
J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):2031-9. PubMed ID: 17209788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of Miller Class I and II localized recession defects using laterally positioned flaps: a 24-month study.
Chambrone LA; Chambrone L
Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 20178209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a 2-year study.
Del Pizzo M; Zucchelli G; Modica F; Villa R; Debernardi C
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 32(11):1181-7. PubMed ID: 16212581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]