496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15842269)
21. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions.
Castellanos A; de la Rosa M; de la Garza M; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16579697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of Class I gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical study.
Côrtes Ade Q; Martins AG; Nociti FH; Sallum AW; Casati MZ; Sallum EA
J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1137-44. PubMed ID: 15455743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The association of a polydioxanone tent without a guided tissue regeneration membrane to a coronal sliding flap for root coverage.
de Toledo Lourenço AH; de Toledo Lourenço E; Fraga MR; Vitral RW
J Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1674-9. PubMed ID: 19792858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of bone grafts for the enhancement of a GTR-based root coverage procedure: a pilot case study.
Wang HL; Kimble K; Eber R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Apr; 22(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 12019707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of anatomical features on the outcome of gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap and enamel matrix derivative: a 1-year prospective study.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Basso M; Weinstein RL
J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 15948683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cervical restoration and the amount of soft tissue coverage achieved by coronally advanced flap: a 2-year follow-up randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Santamaria MP; da Silva Feitosa D; Nociti FH; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 19419445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Coronally positioned flap for root coverage: poorer outcomes in smokers.
Silva CO; Sallum AW; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 16579707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical evaluation of a bioresorbable membrane (polyglactin 910) in the treatment of Miller type II gingival recession.
Gupta R; Pandit N; Sharma M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 16836169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study.
Bittencourt S; Ribeiro Edel P; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):1076-82. PubMed ID: 19563287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of resorbable membrane in treatment of human gingival isolated buccal recession.
Narang S; Gupta R
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 22484865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A clinical comparison of two flap designs for coronal advancement of the gingival margin: semilunar versus coronally advanced flap.
Santana RB; Mattos CM; Dibart S
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Jul; 37(7):651-8. PubMed ID: 20528963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Romagna-Genon C
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1258-64. PubMed ID: 11577960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Coronally advanced flap versus connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth study with a 5-year follow-up.
Pini-Prato GP; Cairo F; Nieri M; Franceschi D; Rotundo R; Cortellini P
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Jul; 37(7):644-50. PubMed ID: 20492074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The clinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coverage compared to coronally positioned flap alone.
Woodyard JG; Greenwell H; Hill M; Drisko C; Iasella JM; Scheetz J
J Periodontol; 2004 Jan; 75(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 15025216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sling and tag suturing technique for coronally advanced flap.
Huang LH; Wang HL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Aug; 27(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 17726994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Root coverage using the coronally positioned flap with or without a subepithelial connective tissue graft.
da Silva RC; Joly JC; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 15088880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
