These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15842486)

  • 1. Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males.
    Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):568-75. PubMed ID: 15842486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standing genetic variance for female resistance to harm from males and its relationship to intralocus sexual conflict.
    Lew TA; Morrow EH; Rice WR
    Evolution; 2006 Jan; 60(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16568635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation.
    Friberg U; Lew TA; Byrne PG; Rice WR
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1540-51. PubMed ID: 16153039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic variation in male and female reproductive characters associated with sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Friberg U
    Behav Genet; 2005 Jul; 35(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 15971026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual conflict is not counterbalanced by good genes in the laboratory Drosophila melanogaster model system.
    Stewart AD; Hannes AM; Mirzatuny A; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1808-13. PubMed ID: 18681915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A QTL analysis of female variation contributing to refractoriness and sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lawniczak MK; Begun DJ
    Genet Res; 2005 Oct; 86(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 16356284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Orteiza N; Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Natural genetic variation in complex mating behaviors of male Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ruedi EA; Hughes KA
    Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):424-36. PubMed ID: 18369720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mutations and natural genetic variation in the courtship song of Drosophila.
    Gleason JM
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 15864442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
    Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative genetics of natural variation of behavior in Drosophila melanogaster: the possible role of the social environment on creating persistent patterns of group activity.
    Higgins LA; Jones KM; Wayne ML
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1529-39. PubMed ID: 16153038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for overdominant selection maintaining X-linked fitness variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Connallon T; Knowles LL
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1445-53. PubMed ID: 16929661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cost of mating rises nonlinearly with copulation frequency in a laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Kuijper B; Stewart AD; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Nov; 19(6):1795-802. PubMed ID: 17040376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymmetry of genetic variation in fitness-related traits: apparent stabilizing selection on g(max).
    McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2009 Nov; 63(11):2838-47. PubMed ID: 19545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing putative interlocus sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster using experimental evolution.
    Stewart AD; Morrow EH; Rice WR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Oct; 272(1576):2029-35. PubMed ID: 16191613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection.
    Hall MD; Bussière LF; Hunt J; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2305-15. PubMed ID: 18540949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remating in Drosophila melanogaster: an examination of the trading-up and intrinsic male-quality hypotheses.
    Byrne PG; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1324-31. PubMed ID: 16135127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sperm competition and mate harm unresponsive to male-limited selection in Drosophila: an evolving genetic architecture under domestication.
    Jiang PP; Bedhomme S; Prasad NG; Chippindale A
    Evolution; 2011 Sep; 65(9):2448-60. PubMed ID: 21884048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bateman's principle and immunity: phenotypically plastic reproductive strategies predict changes in immunological sex differences.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1510-7. PubMed ID: 16153036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.