BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15842740)

  • 21. Effect of contrast, stimulus density, and viewing distance on multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (MSVs).
    Abdullah SN; Aldahlawi N; Rosli Y; Vaegan ; Boon MY; Maddess T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5527-35. PubMed ID: 22786904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multifocal frequency-doubling pattern visual evoked responses to dichoptic stimulation.
    Rosli Y; Maddess T; Dawel A; James AC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 120(12):2100-2108. PubMed ID: 19846337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Binocular summation improves performance to defocus-induced blur.
    Plainis S; Petratou D; Giannakopoulou T; Atchison DA; Tsilimbaris MK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Apr; 52(5):2784-9. PubMed ID: 21228386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Parisi V; Miglior S; Manni G; Centofanti M; Bucci MG
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):216-28. PubMed ID: 16406535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gender-based normative values for pattern-reversal and flash visually evoked potentials under binocular and monocular stimulation in healthy adults.
    Dotto PF; Berezovsky A; Sacai PY; Rocha DM; Salomão SR
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 28560498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Eye movements in response to dichoptic motion: evidence for a parallel-hierarchical structure of visual motion processing in primates.
    Hayashi R; Miura K; Tabata H; Kawano K
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 99(5):2329-46. PubMed ID: 18272870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Peripheral fading with monocular and binocular viewing.
    González EG; Weinstock M; Steinbach MJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 17081583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cross-orientation suppression: monoptic and dichoptic mechanisms are different.
    Li B; Peterson MR; Thompson JK; Duong T; Freeman RD
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 94(2):1645-50. PubMed ID: 15843483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Binocular competitive mechanisms in the visual cortex in early developing kittens of monocular deprivation and reverse suture revealed by pattern visual evoked potential].
    Shou TD; Liu H; Xue JT
    Sheng Li Xue Bao; 1994 Jun; 46(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 7973816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of selective attention on pattern-specific visual evoked potentials.
    Czigler I; Tölgyesi M
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1983 Mar; 25(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 6858589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Amplitude of the transient visual evoked potential (tVEP) as a function of achromatic and chromatic contrast: contribution of different visual pathways.
    Souza GS; Gomes BD; Lacerda EM; Saito CA; da Silva Filho M; Silveira LC
    Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 18321403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A psychophysical study of human binocular interactions in normal and amblyopic visual systems.
    Vedamurthy I; Suttle CM; Alexander J; Asper LJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1522-31. PubMed ID: 18501948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex.
    Moradi F; Heeger DJ
    J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):13.1-22. PubMed ID: 19757952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity and visual acuity with the steady-state visual evoked potential.
    Strasburger H; Remky A; Murray IJ; Hadjizenonos C; Rentschler I
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 5(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 8646179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of visual contrast on visual evoked potentials and Doppler signal.
    Zaletel M; Strucl M; Pogacnik T; Zvan B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 19(12):3353-8. PubMed ID: 15217390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of stimulation frequency and retinal stimulus location on visual evoked potential topography.
    Skrandies W
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 17587164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of stimulus contrast on binocular VER.
    Katsumi O; Oguchi Y; Kawara T; Peli E
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1984; 28(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 6530840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interocular luminance differences and the binocular pattern-reversal visual-evoked response.
    Trick GL; Dawson WW; Compton JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 Mar; 22(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 7061211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.