BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15842740)

  • 41. Intermittent vision and one-handed catching: the temporal limits of binocular and monocular integration.
    Bennett S; Ashford D; Elliott D
    Motor Control; 2003 Oct; 7(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 14999135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Gaussian wavelet transform and classifier to reliably estimate latency of multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP).
    Thie J; Sriram P; Klistorner A; Graham SL
    Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 52(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 22100835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Waveform characteristics of manifest latent nystagmus.
    Abadi RV; Scallan CJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Nov; 41(12):3805-17. PubMed ID: 11053280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reduced binocular beat visual evoked responses and stereoacuity in patients with Duane syndrome.
    Sloper JJ; Garnham C; Gous P; Dyason R; Plunkett D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 42(12):2826-30. PubMed ID: 11687524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interocular interaction of contrast and luminance signals in human primary visual cortex.
    Chadnova E; Reynaud A; Clavagnier S; Baker DH; Baillet S; Hess RF
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():23-30. PubMed ID: 29122719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Visual evoked potentials for reversals of red-green gratings with different chromatic contrasts: asymmetries with respect to isoluminance.
    Rudvin I
    Vis Neurosci; 2005; 22(6):749-58. PubMed ID: 16469185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation.
    Baker DH; Meese TS; Hess RF
    Vision Res; 2008 Jul; 48(15):1625-40. PubMed ID: 18547600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Multifocal steady-state pattern-reversal electroretinography in glaucoma patients].
    Lindenberg T; Horn FK; Korth M
    Ophthalmologe; 2003 Jun; 100(6):453-8. PubMed ID: 12820012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Parvocellular and magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the "C1" component.
    Foxe JJ; Strugstad EC; Sehatpour P; Molholm S; Pasieka W; Schroeder CE; McCourt ME
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 18784997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of pattern-onset, -reversal and -offset VEPs in treated amblyopia.
    Shawkat FS; Kriss A; Timms C; Taylor DS
    Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 5)():863-9. PubMed ID: 10070525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Interocular interactions during acuity measurement in children and adults, and in adults with amblyopia.
    Vedamurthy I; Suttle CM; Alexander J; Asper LJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 17126872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Swept contrast visual evoked potentials and their plasticity following monocular deprivation in mice.
    Lickey ME; Pham TA; Gordon B
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(28):3381-7. PubMed ID: 15536006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Visual information processing and the mechanism of vision. Clinical application].
    Oguchi Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Dec; 102(12):850-75. PubMed ID: 10025116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Decreased contrast sensitivity in normal tension glaucoma determined by pattern visually evoked cortical potentials.
    Sano N; Adachi-Usami E
    Clin Neurosci; 1997; 4(5):292-4. PubMed ID: 9292258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A VEP measure of the binocular fusion of horizontal and vertical disparities.
    Hale J; Harrad RA; McKee SP; Pettet MW; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 May; 46(5):1786-90. PubMed ID: 15851583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The detection of small relative simulated field defects using multifocal VEPs.
    Chan HL; Chu HW; Ng YF; Tam WK; Young SM; Lam CH; Cheung AL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 May; 25(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 15854069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Monocular motion sensing, binocular motion perception.
    Georgeson MA; Shackleton TM
    Vision Res; 1989; 29(11):1511-23. PubMed ID: 2635477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Contrast independence of dynamic random dot correlogram evoked VEP amplitude.
    Markó K; Kiss HJ; Mikó-Baráth E; Bártfai O; Török B; Kovács I; Jandó G
    J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):8.1-10. PubMed ID: 19757917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Interocular differences in visual latency induced by reduced-aperture monovision.
    Plainis S; Petratou D; Giannakopoulou T; Radhakrishnan H; Pallikaris IG; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 23278194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Visual lateralization in response to familiar and unfamiliar stimuli in fish.
    Sovrano VA
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 152(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 15196807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.