These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15843258)
1. Reply to: Cesarean section upon request: is it appropriate for everybody? Husslein P J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(2):112. PubMed ID: 15843258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean section upon request: is it appropriate for everybody? Schumann K J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(5):465; author reply 465. PubMed ID: 16238545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cesarean section upon request: is it appropriate for everybody? Ben-Meir A; Schenker JG; Ezra Y J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 15843257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. II. The unfacts of 'request' caesarean section. Bewley S; Cockburn J BJOG; 2002 Jun; 109(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 12118634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is 38 weeks late enough for elective cesarean delivery? Matsuo K; Komoto Y; Kimura T; Shimoya K Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):90-1. PubMed ID: 17720164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Should patients be entitled to cesarean section on demand?: No. Demers A Can Fam Physician; 2011 Nov; 57(11):1247-8, 1251-2. PubMed ID: 22084453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks. Glavind J; Uldbjerg N Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 27(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 25689238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal mortality and morbidity after elective cesarean delivery versus routine expectant management: a decision analysis. Signore C; Hemachandra A; Klebanoff M Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):288-95. PubMed ID: 17011401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AGAINST: Caesarean delivery on maternal request is a bad idea. Silver RM BJOG; 2015 Feb; 122(3):360. PubMed ID: 25623573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women. Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Neonatal adverse outcome of elective caesarean section before 39 weeks of gestation]. Francisco RP; Zugaib M Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2013; 59(2):93-4. PubMed ID: 23582544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ELECTIVE INDUCTION OF LABOR. GLYNN MZ; MURRAY RR; ESPOSITO J; RUBINO G; ZAROU DM N Y State J Med; 1965 Apr; 65():991-4. PubMed ID: 14267446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Increased number of Cesarean sections without medical indications--in spite of the risks]. Stjernholm YV Lakartidningen; 2007 Mar 21-27; 104(12):942-5. PubMed ID: 17469308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Timing of elective cesarean section and neonatal morbidity: a population-based study. Vidic Z; Blickstein I; Štucin Gantar I; Verdenik I; Tul N J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(15):2461-3. PubMed ID: 26444222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing primary cesarean delivery: can we prevent current and future morbidity and mortality? Caughey AB J Perinatol; 2009 Nov; 29(11):717-8. PubMed ID: 19861968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]