These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15843417)

  • 1. Simultaneous recordings of oesophageal acid exposure with conventional pH monitoring and a wireless system (Bravo).
    des Varannes SB; Mion F; Ducrotté P; Zerbib F; Denis P; Ponchon T; Thibault R; Galmiche JP
    Gut; 2005 Dec; 54(12):1682-6. PubMed ID: 15843417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oesophageal pH monitoring using the Bravo catheter-free radio capsule.
    Gillies RS; Stratford JM; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jan; 19(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 17206078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acid reflux event detection using the Bravo wireless versus the Slimline catheter pH systems: why are the numbers so different?
    Pandolfino JE; Zhang Q; Schreiner MA; Ghosh S; Roth MP; Kahrilas PJ
    Gut; 2005 Dec; 54(12):1687-92. PubMed ID: 15923666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Successful esophageal pH monitoring with Bravo capsule in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease].
    Valdovinos Díaz MA; Remes Troche JM; Ruiz Aguilar JC; Schmulson MJ; Valdovinos-Andraca F
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 15757153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.
    Pandolfino JE; Richter JE; Ours T; Guardino JM; Chapman J; Kahrilas PJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):740-9. PubMed ID: 12738450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
    Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)].
    Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P
    Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 48-hour wireless oesophageal pH-monitoring in children: are two days better than one?
    Gunnarsdóttir A; Stenström P; Arnbjörnsson E
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2007 Dec; 17(6):378-81. PubMed ID: 18072019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review article: modern technology in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--Bilitec, intraluminal impedance and Bravo capsule pH monitoring.
    Hirano I
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Mar; 23 Suppl 1():12-24. PubMed ID: 16483266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. BRAVO wireless 48 hour pH-metric system.
    Hess T; Hahn EG; Konturek PC
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Jan; 15(1):RA17-21. PubMed ID: 19114981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ambulatory pH: monitoring with a wireless system.
    Schneider JH; Kramer KM; Königsrainer A; Granderath FA
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Nov; 21(11):2076-80. PubMed ID: 17484003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Outpatient monitoring of oesophageal pH with a catheter-free pH-meter (Bravo System). A Study of tolerance, safety and efficacy].
    Martínez de Haro LF; Munitiz V; Ortiz A; Ruiz de Angulo D; Navarro MD; Parrilla P
    Cir Esp; 2008 Oct; 84(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 18928770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bravo wireless versus catheter pH monitoring systems.
    Fox M
    Gut; 2006 Mar; 55(3):434-5. PubMed ID: 16474112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review article: oesophageal pH monitoring--technologies, interpretation and correlation with clinical outcomes.
    Kahrilas PJ; Pandolfino JE
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():2-9. PubMed ID: 16303031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring by using a wireless system: a pilot study in Taiwan.
    Tu CH; Lee YC; Wang HP; Wu MS; Chiu HM; Lin JT
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1586-9. PubMed ID: 15532783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of respiratory symptoms with dual pH monitoring in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
    Kauer WK; Stein HJ; Möbius C; Siewert JR
    Br J Surg; 2004 Jul; 91(7):867-71. PubMed ID: 15227693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.
    López-Alonso M; Moya MJ; Cabo JA; Ribas J; del Carmen Macías M; Silny J; Sifrim D
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e299-308. PubMed ID: 16831894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Efficacy, diagnostic utility and tolerance of intraesophageal pH ambulatory determination with wireless pH-testing monitoring system].
    Carmona-Sánchez R; Solana-Sentíes S
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 15757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bravo capsule placement in the gastric cardia: a novel method for analysis of proximal stomach acid environment.
    Pandolfino JE; Schreiner MA; Lee TJ; Zhang Q; Kahrilas PJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Aug; 100(8):1721-7. PubMed ID: 16086707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of 24-hour oesophageal pH-metry for the detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants: what is the ideal score and the optimal threshold? A receiver-operating-characteristic analysis.
    Carroccio A; Cavataio F; Acierno E; Montalto G; Lorello D; Tumminello M; Soresi M; Li Voti G; Iacono G
    Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1997 Aug; 29(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 9476179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.