These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15844742)

  • 21. Auditory steady-state responses.
    Korczak P; Smart J; Delgado R; Strobel TM; Bradford C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):146-70. PubMed ID: 22436114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An investigation into the clinical utility of ipsilateral/contralateral asymmetries in bone-conduction auditory steady-state responses.
    Small SA; Love A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):604-12. PubMed ID: 24801532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults.
    Van Maanen A; Stapells DR
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Nov; 44(11):613-24. PubMed ID: 16379489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multiple auditory steady state response thresholds to bone conduction stimuli in adults with normal and elevated thresholds.
    Ishida IM; Cuthbert BP; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 21206364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical application of dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses in high-risk newborns and young children.
    Luts H; Desloovere C; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 16219992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of Stimulus Bandwidth on the Auditory Steady-State Response in Scalp- and Ear-EEG.
    Sergeeva A; Bech Christensen C; Kidmose P
    Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):626-635. PubMed ID: 38178314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Frequency-specific objective audiometry: tone-evoked brainstem responses and steady-state responses to 40 Hz and 90 Hz amplitude modulated stimuli.
    van der Reijden CS; Mens LH; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jan; 45(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 16562563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of air-conduction and bone-conduction hearing thresholds for pure tones and octave-band filtered sound effects.
    Abouchacra KS; Letowski T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Sep; 10(8):422-8. PubMed ID: 10813642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiple auditory steady-state responses in children and adults with normal hearing, sensorineural hearing loss, or auditory neuropathy.
    Attias J; Buller N; Rubel Y; Raveh E
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2006 Apr; 115(4):268-76. PubMed ID: 16676823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiple-ASSR thresholds in infants and young children with hearing loss.
    Van Maanen A; Stapells DR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):535-45. PubMed ID: 21034700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of varying phase between frequency and amplitude modulation on bone conduction auditory steady state responses.
    Brennan SK; Brooke RE; Stevens JC; Brown BH
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):815-24. PubMed ID: 20921891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multiple auditory steady state responses (80-101 Hz): effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity and modulation rate.
    Picton TW; van Roon P; John MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 19125032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol.
    Swanepoel D; Schmulian D; Hugo R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jan; 124(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 14977080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The clinical value of the multiple-frequency 80-Hz auditory steady-state response in adults with normal hearing and hearing loss.
    D'haenens W; Dhooge I; Maes L; Bockstael A; Keppler H; Philips B; Swinnen F; Vinck BM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 135(5):496-506. PubMed ID: 19451472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects.
    Herdman AT; Stapells DR
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 11330918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.
    Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prognostic validity of dichotic multiple frequencies auditory steady-state responses versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high risk neonates.
    Mahmoudian S; Farhadi M; Kadivar M; Ghalehbaghi B; Rahimi F; Hemami MR; Kamrava SK; Asghari A; Amintehran E; Mohagheghi P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1109-16. PubMed ID: 21719120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stability of Auditory Steady State Responses Over Time.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Luke R; Wouters J; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):260-268. PubMed ID: 28857787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses in evaluating the hearing thresholds of occupational noise-exposed workers.
    Hsu RF; Chen SS; Lu SN; Ho CK; Lin HF
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):330-5. PubMed ID: 21802644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.