These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15845310)

  • 1. Windows.
    Tonneau F
    Behav Processes; 2005 May; 69(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 15845310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "The stone which the builders rejected...": Delay of reinforcement and response rate on fixed-interval and related schedules.
    Wearden JH; Lejeune H
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):77-87. PubMed ID: 16307848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From recurrent choice to skill learning: a reinforcement-learning model.
    Fu WT; Anderson JR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):184-206. PubMed ID: 16719650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acquisition with partial and continuous reinforcement in rat magazine approach.
    Gottlieb DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):319-33. PubMed ID: 16045386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinforcer probability, reinforcer magnitude, and the reinforcement context for remembering.
    Brown GS; White KG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 19364232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term memory traces for action bias in human reinforcement learning.
    Bogacz R; McClure SM; Li J; Cohen JD; Montague PR
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1153():111-21. PubMed ID: 17459346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of unsignaled delays between stimuli in a chain schedule on responding and resistance to change.
    Bell MC; Gomez BE
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 17933472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of partial reinforcement and time between reinforced trials on terminal response rate in pigeon autoshaping.
    Gottlieb DA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 16413974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Undermatching is an emergent property of selection by consequences.
    McDowell JJ; Caron ML
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 17399915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
    Reed P; Yoshino T
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid acquisition in concurrent chains: effects of initial-link duration.
    Christensen DR; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 18304759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-sharing in pigeons: Independent effects of gap duration, position and discriminability from the timed signal.
    Buhusi CV; Paskalis JP; Cerutti DT
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):116-25. PubMed ID: 16414210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) reduces operant behavior without impairing working memory in rats responding under fixed-consecutive-number schedules.
    Laraway S; Snycerski S; Baker LE; Poling A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2008 Jan; 88(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 17904624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When to respond? And how much? Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable components.
    Whitaker S; Lowe CF; Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 17628349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential behavior in the rat: a new model using food-reinforced instrumental behavior.
    Domenger D; Schwarting RK
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 15863217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goal-directed learning of features and forward models.
    Saeb S; Weber C; Triesch J
    Neural Netw; 2009; 22(5-6):586-92. PubMed ID: 19616917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.
    Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.