443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15845654)
1. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
Jung SH
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
Liu P; Hwang JT
Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size calculation through the incorporation of heteroscedasticity and dependence for a penalized t-statistic in microarray experiments.
Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 22251173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FDR-controlling testing procedures and sample size determination for microarrays.
Li SS; Bigler J; Lampe JW; Potter JD; Feng Z
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2267-80. PubMed ID: 15977294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microarray data analysis: a hierarchical T-test to handle heteroscedasticity.
de Menezes RX; Boer JM; van Houwelingen HC
Appl Bioinformatics; 2004; 3(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 15702953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A weighted sample size for microarray datasets that considers the variability of variance and multiplicity.
Kim KY; Chung HC; Rha SY
J Biosci Bioeng; 2009 Sep; 108(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 19664562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size determination for the false discovery rate.
Pounds S; Cheng C
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4263-71. PubMed ID: 16204346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploiting sample variability to enhance multivariate analysis of microarray data.
Möller-Levet CS; West CM; Miller CJ
Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 23(20):2733-40. PubMed ID: 17827205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robust estimation of the false discovery rate.
Pounds S; Cheng C
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):1979-87. PubMed ID: 16777905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size calculation with dependence adjustment for FDR-control in microarray studies.
Shao Y; Tseng CH
Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4219-37. PubMed ID: 17328091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating effect sizes of differentially expressed genes for power and sample-size assessments in microarray experiments.
Matsui S; Noma H
Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 21627629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding sample size: what determines the required number of microarrays for an experiment?
Jørstad TS; Langaas M; Bones AM
Trends Plant Sci; 2007 Feb; 12(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 17229587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization.
Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H
Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
