These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15845946)

  • 41. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Optimisation strategies introduced for CR at health care centres in Estonia.
    Kepler K; Vladimirov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):127-31. PubMed ID: 18252852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Digital radiography.
    Kruger RA
    Mead Johnson Symp Perinat Dev Med; 1987; (25):4-9. PubMed ID: 3506961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Transitioning to digital radiography.
    Drost WT
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2011 Apr; 21(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 21463440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Digital templating: here to stay.
    Parvizi J
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Aug; 40(8):394. PubMed ID: 22016867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Computed tomography dose optimization.
    Seeram E
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):655CT-671CT; quiz 672CT-675CT. PubMed ID: 25002653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Digital x-ray: unwavering commitment collides with monumental challenges.
    Freiherr G
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D4-7. PubMed ID: 10724732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Digital image analysis in the office.
    Rieger MR
    J Gt Houst Dent Soc; 1994 Dec; 66(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 9584728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Image evaluation in digital age: what is the different from analog image].
    Kodera Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 22516604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Image processing technology required for digital image--The first part].
    Funahashi M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Oct; 63(10):1189-99. PubMed ID: 18187902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Domestic Market Trend for Medical Imaging and Radiological System (First Half of FY2016)].
    Kajiyama K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(1):80-82. PubMed ID: 28111402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Critical review of the radiologic technic and symptomatology of colitis].
    Pringot J; Goncette L; Mahieu P; Van Heuverzwyn R
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 1980; 43(9-10):398-408. PubMed ID: 7211127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Preface for Special Issue on the Functional Image].
    Wagatsuma K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(11):1117. PubMed ID: 29151543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [11. Low kV -Techniques in Clinical Urology].
    Tani W
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022; 78(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 35046225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Specific features of monitoring the characteristics of digital X-ray diagnostic systems].
    Zelikman MI
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 12512272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
    Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Threshold-contrast detectability curves for digital acquisition.
    Kotre CJ; Marshall NW
    Br J Radiol; 2005 May; 78(929):469-70; author reply 470. PubMed ID: 15845946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.