279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15846318)
1. Funding shouldn't rely on competing death tolls.
Hilbert D
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7036):956. PubMed ID: 15846318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Why funding cuts at the National Institutes of Health are so painful.
Garrison HH; McGuire KI; Palazzo RE
Physiologist; 2007 Aug; 50(4):129, 131-3. PubMed ID: 17883021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protest letter accuses health agency of biodefence bias.
Check E
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):7. PubMed ID: 15744263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
Max MB
J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. War of words deepens divide over biodefence funds.
Marris E
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):813. PubMed ID: 15829930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. No more third time lucky.
Ledford H
Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7215):841. PubMed ID: 18923475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bush's belt-tightening budget offers science slim pickings.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6974):475. PubMed ID: 14765158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Academies seek better prospects for postdocs.
Ebert J
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):426. PubMed ID: 15791219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomedical funding remains flat.
Check E
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7077):644. PubMed ID: 16496450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Surviving the shortfall: decreased research funding from traditional sources has led some investigators to get creative.
Mettner J
Minn Med; 2014 May; 97(5):8-10. PubMed ID: 24941580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An open letter to Elias Zerhouni.
Altman S; Bassler BL; Beckwith J; Belfort M; Berg HC; Bloom B; Brenchley JE; Campbell A; Collier RJ; Connell N; Cozzarelli NR; Craig NL; Darst S; Ebright RH; Elledge SJ; Falkow S; Galan JE; Gottesman M; Gourse R; Grindley ND; Gross CA; Grossman A; Hochschild A; Howe M; Hurwitz J; Isberg RR; Kaplan S; Kornberg A; Kustu SG; Landick RC; Landy A; Levy SB; Losick R; Long SR; Maloy SR; Mekalanos JJ; Neidhardt FC; Pace NR; Ptashne M; Roberts JW; Roth JR; Rothman-Denes LB; Salyers A; Schaechter M; Shapiro L; Silhavy TJ; Simon MI; Walker G; Yanofsky C; Zinder N
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5714):1409-10. PubMed ID: 15746409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Funding agendas: has bioterror defense been over-prioritized?
May T
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):34-44. PubMed ID: 16109694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbiology. Détente declared on NIH biodefense funding.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 May; 308(5724):938. PubMed ID: 15890854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biodefense. Has biodefense gone overboard?
Enserink M; Kaiser J
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5714):1396-8. PubMed ID: 15746402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Worries over bioterrorism push.
Dixon B
Curr Biol; 2005 Apr; 15(7):R229-30. PubMed ID: 15864848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Limit the number of grants per person.
Sachs F
Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6639):222. PubMed ID: 9230423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research funding. U.S. biodefense boom: eight new study centers.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5639):1450-1. PubMed ID: 12970522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review reviewed.
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Share issues.
Nature; 2004 Aug; 430(7003):951. PubMed ID: 15329678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NerveCenter: Changes in store for R01 grants?
Stone K
Ann Neurol; 2011 Mar; 69(3):A13-4. PubMed ID: 21446016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
