These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1584641)

  • 1. Functional benefit of an adaptive myoelectric prosthetic hand compared to a conventional myoelectric hand.
    Bergman K; Ornholmer L; Zackrisson K; Thyberg M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Apr; 16(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 1584641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of silicone prosthesis on hand function, grip power and grip-force tracking ability after finger amputation.
    Kuret Z; Burger H; Vidmar G; Maver T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Dec; 40(6):744-750. PubMed ID: 26243175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of multi-grip myoelectric prosthetic hands on daily activities, pain-related disability and prosthesis use compared with single-grip myoelectric prostheses: A single-case study.
    Widehammar C; Hiyoshi A; Lidström Holmqvist K; Lindner H; Hermansson L
    J Rehabil Med; 2022 Jan; 54():jrm00245. PubMed ID: 34766184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New prosthetic device helps grant second chance at "normal life".
    Woodruff J
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 2007 Jul; 48(7):222-3. PubMed ID: 17939257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Traumatic quadruple amputee rehabilitation: from amputation to prosthetic functionality: a case report.
    Monné Cuevas P; Borrás Correa A; Vidal Fortuny E; Ángeles Diaz Vela M; Calvo Sanz J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 31373523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical experience with a hierarchically controlled myoelectric hand prosthesis with vibro-tactile feedback.
    Kyberd PJ; Mustapha N; Carnegie F; Chappell PH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Apr; 17(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 8337101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term results of early myoelectric prosthesis fittings: A prospective case-control study.
    Sjöberg L; Lindner H; Hermansson L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):527-533. PubMed ID: 28905686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic evaluation of upper limb prostheses in the Netherlands including the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip versus standard myoelectric hand prostheses.
    Kerver N; Karssies E; Krabbe PFM; van der Sluis CK; Groen H
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Dec; 45(25):4311-4321. PubMed ID: 36533430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The artificial hand. An overview of hand prostheses].
    Matussek J; Neff G
    Orthopade; 2003 May; 32(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 12743692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functionality of i-LIMB and i-LIMB pulse hands: case report.
    van der Niet O; Bongers RM; van der Sluis CK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(8):1123-8. PubMed ID: 24458898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Myoelectric prosthesis users and non-disabled individuals wearing a simulated prosthesis exhibit similar compensatory movement strategies.
    Williams HE; Chapman CS; Pilarski PM; Vette AH; Hebert JS
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 33933105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The i-LIMB hand and the DMC plus hand compared: a case report.
    Otr OV; Reinders-Messelink HA; Bongers RM; Bouwsema H; Van Der Sluis CK
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Jun; 34(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 20470060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users.
    Pylatiuk C; Schulz S; Döderlein L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Dec; 31(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 18050007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forearm amputees' views of prosthesis use and sensory feedback.
    Wijk U; Carlsson I
    J Hand Ther; 2015; 28(3):269-77; quiz 278. PubMed ID: 25990442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Upper limb amputations and prostheses.
    Beasley RW; de Bese GM
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1986 Jul; 17(3):395-405. PubMed ID: 3737136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The multi-grip and standard myoelectric hand prosthesis compared: does the multi-grip hand live up to its promise?
    Kerver N; Schuurmans V; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Feb; 20(1):22. PubMed ID: 36793049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Affordable passive 3D-printed prosthesis for persons with partial hand amputation.
    Alturkistani R; A K; Devasahayam S; Thomas R; Colombini EL; Cifuentes CA; Homer-Vanniasinkam S; Wurdemann HA; Moazen M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Apr; 44(2):92-98. PubMed ID: 32100630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A wrist-powered hand prosthesis.
    Dick T; Lamb DW; Douglas WB
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1984 Nov; 66(5):742-4. PubMed ID: 6501372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying Health Utility Outcome Measures and Quality-Adjusted Life-Years to Compare Hand Allotransplantation and Myoelectric Prostheses for Upper Extremity Amputations.
    Efanov JI; Izadpanah A; Bou-Merhi J; Lin SJ; Danino MA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 149(3):465e-474e. PubMed ID: 35196684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.