287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15846487)
1. Clinical evaluation of 2D versus 3D whole-body PET image quality using a dedicated BGO PET scanner.
Visvikis D; Griffiths D; Costa DC; Bomanji J; Ell PJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Sep; 32(9):1050-6. PubMed ID: 15846487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional acquisition for 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner.
Lodge MA; Badawi RD; Gilbert R; Dibos PE; Line BR
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 16391183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Comtat C
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):714-23. PubMed ID: 15073270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.
Bettinardi V; Mancosu P; Danna M; Giovacchini G; Landoni C; Picchio M; Gilardi MC; Savi A; Castiglioni I; Lecchi M; Fazio F
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 51(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 17464266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional positron emission tomography imaging with 124I and 86Y.
Vandenberghe S
Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Mar; 27(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 16479243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.
El Fakhri G; Santos PA; Badawi RD; Holdsworth CH; Van Den Abbeele AD; Kijewski MF
J Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18006613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Tanaka K; Yamamoto S; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Amano M; Murase K; Senda M
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 16391191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of PET image reconstruction using a spatial resolution model.
Andersen FL; Klausen TL; Loft A; Beyer T; Holm S
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):862-9. PubMed ID: 23254158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. NEMA NU 2-2001 performance measurements of an LYSO-based PET/CT system in 2D and 3D acquisition modes.
Kemp BJ; Kim C; Williams JJ; Ganin A; Lowe VJ;
J Nucl Med; 2006 Dec; 47(12):1960-7. PubMed ID: 17138738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST.
Bettinardi V; Danna M; Savi A; Lecchi M; Castiglioni I; Gilardi MC; Bammer H; Lucignani G; Fazio F
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jun; 31(6):867-81. PubMed ID: 14770270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes.
Mawlawi O; Podoloff DA; Kohlmyer S; Williams JJ; Stearns CW; Culp RF; Macapinlac H;
J Nucl Med; 2004 Oct; 45(10):1734-42. PubMed ID: 15471842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the utility of whole-body MRI with and without contrast-enhanced Quick 3D and double RF fat suppression techniques, conventional whole-body MRI, PET/CT and conventional examination for assessment of recurrence in NSCLC patients.
Ohno Y; Nishio M; Koyama H; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Takenaka D; Seki S; Tsubakimoto M; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2018-27. PubMed ID: 24012452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-D PET.
Surti S; Karp JS; Popescu LM; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Werner M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):529-38. PubMed ID: 16689258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel method for the optimization of positron emission tomography scanners imaging performance.
Michail CM; Karpetas GE; Fountos GP; Kalyvas NI; Valais IG; Fountzoula C; Zanglis A; Kandarakis IS; Panayiotakis GS
Hell J Nucl Med; 2016; 19(3):231-240. PubMed ID: 27824962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of noise equivalent count rate performance for a partially collimated PET scanner by varying the number of septa.
Schmitz RE; Harrison RL; Stearns CW; Lewellen TK; Kinahan PE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):935-44. PubMed ID: 17649907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience.
Quick HH; von Gall C; Zeilinger M; Wiesmüller M; Braun H; Ziegler S; Kuwert T; Uder M; Dörfler A; Kalender WA; Lell M
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):280-9. PubMed ID: 23442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of list mode data acquisition with ECAT EXACT HR and ECAT EXACT HR+ positron emission scanners.
Watabe H; Matsumoto K; Senda M; Iida H
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Apr; 20(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 16715949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality.
Brasse D; Kinahan PE; Lartizien C; Comtat C; Casey M; Michel C
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):859-67. PubMed ID: 15872361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-Dimensional Isotropic Fat-Suppressed Proton Density-Weighted MRI at 3 Tesla Using a T/R-Coil Can Replace Multiple Plane Two-Dimensional Sequences in Knee Imaging.
Homsi R; Gieseke J; Luetkens JA; Kupczyk P; Maedler B; Kukuk GM; Träber F; Agha B; Rauch M; Rajakaruna N; Willinek W; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
Rofo; 2016 Oct; 188(10):949-56. PubMed ID: 27556275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
