92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15847230)
1. Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.
Burns DJ; Hebert T
Memory; 2005 Feb; 13(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15847230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gains and losses in action memory.
Engelkamp J; Seiler KH
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):829-48. PubMed ID: 12850992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Segregation accuracy in item-method directed forgetting across multiple tests.
Goernert PN; Widner RL; Otani H
Br J Psychol; 2006 May; 97(Pt 2):245-58. PubMed ID: 16613651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Directed forgetting: further comparisons of the item and list methods.
Basden BH; Basden DR
Memory; 1996 Nov; 4(6):633-53. PubMed ID: 8934458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.
Burns DJ; Jenkins CL; Dean EE
Mem Cognit; 2007 Oct; 35(7):1630-40. PubMed ID: 18062541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification accuracy across multiple tests following item method directed forgetting.
Goernert PN; Widner RL; Otani H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1178-86. PubMed ID: 17676551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: a test of the outshining hypothesis.
Cousins R; Hanley JR
Memory; 1996 Jan; 4(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 8821087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Source-monitoring accuracy across repeated tests following directed forgetting.
Goernert PN
Br J Psychol; 2005 May; 96(Pt 2):231-47. PubMed ID: 15969833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference.
Burns DJ; Gold DE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jul; 25(4):978-85. PubMed ID: 10439504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.
Lian A; Karlsen PJ; Eriksen TB
Memory; 2004 May; 12(3):314-37. PubMed ID: 15279435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Directed forgetting in older adults using the item and list methods.
Sego SA; Golding JM; Gottlob LR
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006 Mar; 13(1):95-114. PubMed ID: 16766345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Memory evaluation in mild cognitive impairment using recall and recognition tests.
Bennett IJ; Golob EJ; Parker ES; Starr A
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2006 Nov; 28(8):1408-22. PubMed ID: 17050267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Directed forgetting in working memory: age-related differences.
Andrés P; Van der Linden M; Parmentier FB
Memory; 2004 Mar; 12(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 15250189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Item-specific encoding produces an additional benefit of directed forgetting: evidence from intrusion errors.
Sahakyan L; Delaney PF
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1346-54. PubMed ID: 20804302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of a semantically cued recall procedure for the mini-mental state examination.
Yuspeh RL; Vanderploeg RD; Kershaw DA
Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol; 1998 Oct; 11(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9845412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Memory for items and memory for relations in the procedural/declarative memory framework.
Cohen NJ; Poldrack RA; Eichenbaum H
Memory; 1997; 5(1-2):131-78. PubMed ID: 9156097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Output monitoring tests reveal false memories of memories that never existed.
Marsh RL; Hicks JL
Memory; 2001 Jan; 9(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 11315660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
