213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15847317)
1. A review of the use of olopatadine in allergic conjunctivitis.
McGill JI
Int Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 25(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 15847317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study of the mast cell-stabilizing effects of treatment with olopatadine in the conjunctival allergen challenge model in humans.
Leonardi A; Abelson MB
Clin Ther; 2003 Oct; 25(10):2539-52. PubMed ID: 14667955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of olopatadine for the treatment of ocular allergy.
Abelson MB
Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2004 Sep; 5(9):1979-94. PubMed ID: 15330735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ocular allergy treatment comparisons: azelastine and olopatadine.
Bielory L; Buddiga P; Bigelson S
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep; 2004 Jul; 4(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 15175148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Olopatadine: a drug for allergic conjunctivitis targeting the mast cell.
Leonardi A; Quintieri L
Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2010 Apr; 11(6):969-81. PubMed ID: 20307221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
Deschenes J; Discepola M; Abelson M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):47-52. PubMed ID: 10337433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Allergic conjunctivitis and contact lenses: experience with olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% therapy.
Brodsky M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (230):56-9. PubMed ID: 11057353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of clinical efficacy and tolerance in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis management with 0.1% olopatadine hydrochloride versus 0.05% ketotifen fumarate.
Aguilar AJ
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (230):52-5. PubMed ID: 11057352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Olopatadine (AL-4943A): ligand binding and functional studies on a novel, long acting H1-selective histamine antagonist and anti-allergic agent for use in allergic conjunctivitis.
Sharif NA; Xu SX; Yanni JM
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 1996; 12(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 8951676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of epinastine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in allergic conjunctivitis by conjunctival cedar pollen allergen challenge.
Fujishima H; Ohashi Y; Takamura E
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2014 Oct; 113(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 25163405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A forced choice comfort study of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% versus ketotifen fumarate 0.05%.
Artal MN; Luna JD; Discepola M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (230):64-5. PubMed ID: 11057355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The added benefit of local Patanol therapy when combined with systemic Claritin for the inhibition of ocular itching in the conjunctival antigen challenge model.
Abelson MB; Lanier RQ
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):53-6. PubMed ID: 10337434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmacological, pharmacokinetic and clinical properties of olopatadine hydrochloride, a new antiallergic drug.
Ohmori K; Hayashi K; Kaise T; Ohshima E; Kobayashi S; Yamazaki T; Mukouyama A
Jpn J Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 88(4):379-97. PubMed ID: 12046981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Katelaris CH; Ciprandi G; Missotten L; Turner FD; Bertin D; Berdeaux G;
Clin Ther; 2002 Oct; 24(10):1561-75. PubMed ID: 12462286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Turner D
Clin Ther; 2003 Mar; 25(3):931-47. PubMed ID: 12852709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of 0.1% olopatadine hydrochloride and 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Yaylali V; Demirlenk I; Tatlipinar S; Ozbay D; Esme A; Yildirim C; Ozden S
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2003 Aug; 81(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 12859265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the effects of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, 0.2% on the ocular surface of patients with allergic conjunctivitis and dry eye.
Mah FS; O'Brien T; Kim T; Torkildsen G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Feb; 24(2):441-7. PubMed ID: 18167176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
Brodsky M; Berger WE; Butrus S; Epstein AB; Irkec M
Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12695716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% in the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis and goblet cell density.
Corum I; Yeniad B; Bilgin LK; Ilhan R
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Oct; 21(5):400-5. PubMed ID: 16245967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
