150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15848465)
21. Declining outcomes in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation in the MELD era: ineffective usage of renal allografts.
Locke JE; Warren DS; Singer AL; Segev DL; Simpkins CE; Maley WR; Montgomery RA; Danovitch G; Cameron AM
Transplantation; 2008 Apr; 85(7):935-42. PubMed ID: 18408571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MELD and prediction of post-liver transplantation survival.
Habib S; Berk B; Chang CC; Demetris AJ; Fontes P; Dvorchik I; Eghtesad B; Marcos A; Shakil AO
Liver Transpl; 2006 Mar; 12(3):440-7. PubMed ID: 16498643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The sickest first? Disparities with model for end-stage liver disease-based organ allocation: one region's experience.
Schaffer RL; Kulkarni S; Harper A; Millis JM; Cronin DC
Liver Transpl; 2003 Nov; 9(11):1211-5. PubMed ID: 14586883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The impact of MELD on OPTN liver allocation: preliminary results.
Edwards EB; Harper AM
Clin Transpl; 2002; ():21-8. PubMed ID: 12971434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of pretransplant MELD score on posttransplant outcome in living donor liver transplantation.
Akyildiz M; Karasu Z; Arikan C; Kilic M; Zeytunlu M; Gunsar F; Ersoz G; Akarca U; Batur Y; Tokat Y
Transplant Proc; 2004 Jun; 36(5):1442-4. PubMed ID: 15251354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The introduction of MELD-based organ allocation impacts 3-month survival after liver transplantation by influencing pretransplant patient characteristics.
Weismüller TJ; Negm A; Becker T; Barg-Hock H; Klempnauer J; Manns MP; Strassburg CP
Transpl Int; 2009 Oct; 22(10):970-8. PubMed ID: 19619170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Influence of recipient pretransplant MELD-AS score and graft size on the outcome of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation].
Feng X; Wei YG; Li FQ; Yuan D; Jiang H; Du ZG; Yin J; Li B
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Sep; 39(5):801-4. PubMed ID: 19024318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Consequences of the implementation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease system for liver allocation in Brazil.
Pestana RC; Baracat EI; Massarollo PC; Pereira LA; Szutan LA
Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(6):2111-4. PubMed ID: 23747144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. ABO blood group-related waiting list disparities in liver transplant candidates: effect of the MELD adoption.
Barone M; Avolio AW; Di Leo A; Burra P; Francavilla A
Transplantation; 2008 Mar; 85(6):844-9. PubMed ID: 18360266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Longitudinal assessment of mortality risk among candidates for liver transplantation.
Merion RM; Wolfe RA; Dykstra DM; Leichtman AB; Gillespie B; Held PJ
Liver Transpl; 2003 Jan; 9(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 12514767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Whole liver versus split liver versus living donor in the adult recipient: an analysis of outcomes by graft type.
Humar A; Beissel J; Crotteau S; Kandaswamy R; Lake J; Payne W
Transplantation; 2008 May; 85(10):1420-4. PubMed ID: 18497681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of liver transplantation outcome in patients with MELD Score > or = 30.
Ferraz-Neto BH; Zurstrassen MP; Hidalgo R; Meira-Filho SP; Rezende MB; Paes AT; Afonso RC
Transplant Proc; 2008 Apr; 40(3):797-9. PubMed ID: 18455020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Survival benefit after liver transplantation: a single European center experience.
Ravaioli M; Grazi GL; Dazzi A; Bertuzzo V; Ercolani G; Cescon M; Cucchetti A; Masetti M; Ramacciato G; Pinna AD
Transplantation; 2009 Sep; 88(6):826-34. PubMed ID: 19920783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. True impact of the indication of cirrhosis and the MELD on the results of liver transplantation.
Santoyo J; Suarez MA; Fernandez-Aguilar JL; Perez Daga JA; Sanchez-Perez B; Ramirez C; Aranda JM; RodrÃguez-Canete A; Gonzalez-Sanchez A
Transplant Proc; 2006 Oct; 38(8):2462-4. PubMed ID: 17097967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of model for end-stage liver disease on patient survival and disease-free survival in patients receiving liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Moonka D; Castillo E; Kumer S; Abouljoud M; Divine G; Pelletier S
Transplant Proc; 2009; 41(1):216-8. PubMed ID: 19249517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of the MELD allocation system and predictors of survival.
Ioannou GN; Perkins JD; Carithers RL
Gastroenterology; 2008 May; 134(5):1342-51. PubMed ID: 18471511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficacy of MELD score in predicting survival after liver retransplantation.
Ravaioli M; Grazi GL; Ercolani G; Cescon M; Varotti G; Del Gaudio M; Vetrone G; Lauro A; Ballardini G; Pinna AD
Transplant Proc; 2004 Nov; 36(9):2748-9. PubMed ID: 15621139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Selection of pediatric candidates under the PELD system.
McDiarmid SV; Merion RM; Dykstra DM; Harper AM
Liver Transpl; 2004 Oct; 10(10 Suppl 2):S23-30. PubMed ID: 15384170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Allocation of nonstandard livers to transplant candidates with high MELD scores: Should this practice be continued?
Avolio AW; Agnes S; Gasbarrini A; Barbarino R; Nure E; Siciliano M; Barone M; Castagneto M
Transplant Proc; 2006 Dec; 38(10):3567-71. PubMed ID: 17175333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004.
Gruessner AC; Sutherland DE
Clin Transplant; 2005 Aug; 19(4):433-55. PubMed ID: 16008587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
