BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1584930)

  • 1. Role of low-osmolality contrast media in thromboembolic complications: scanning electron microscopy study.
    Casalini E
    Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):741-4. PubMed ID: 1584930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of clot formation with ionic and nonionic contrast media in cerebral angiography. Tama Contrast Media Study Group.
    Sato E; Saito I
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Nov; 3(11):925-8. PubMed ID: 8959182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Delayed vs. immediate adverse reactions to ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast media.
    Oi H; Yamazaki H; Matsushita M
    Radiat Med; 1997; 15(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9134581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. TAT, F1 + 2, and D-dimer levels in patients after coronary angiography with nonionic or ionic contrast media or after cardiac catheterization.
    Biancardi M; Cimminiello C; Toschi V; Schiavina G; Regalia F; Casolo F; Bonfardeci G
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 1996; 22 Suppl 1():61-5. PubMed ID: 8807731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effects of contrast media under systemic heparinization on blood coagulation and fibrinolytic system during angiocardiography--comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media].
    Himi K; Takemoto A; Himi S; Kamata R
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Aug; 52(8):1139-47. PubMed ID: 1408685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of thromboembolism during diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures with nonionic contrast media.
    Hwang MH; Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Messmore HL; Giardina JJ; Scanlon PJ
    Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 2296654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography.
    Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Dahlgren M; Muslin A
    Am J Cardiol; 1989 Feb; 63(7):489-95. PubMed ID: 2916435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Significance of low osmolarity contrast media in state of the art roentgen diagnosis].
    Pokorny L; Kiss I; Karcsú S; Nehéz I; Feledi J; Vadon G
    Orv Hetil; 1989 Jun; 130(25):1317-21. PubMed ID: 2664636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effects of uro-angiographic contrast media on blood coagulation--a scanning electron microscopic study on time dependent changes of blood clot and a clinical study].
    Himi K; Himi S; Takemoto A; Kamata R
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Jan; 52(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 1549448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The anticoagulant effects of ionic and nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in dogs.
    Kurisu Y; Tada S
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Sep; 27(9):686-8. PubMed ID: 1399451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
    Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adverse reactions of low osmolality contrast media during cardiac angiography: a prospective randomized multicenter study.
    Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Miller R; Knudtson M; Robb J; Dragatakis L; Browne KF; Vetrovec G; Smith SC
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Apr; 19(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 1552109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Activation of platelets by low-osmolar contrast media: differential effects of ionic and nonionic agents.
    Hardeman MR; Konijnenberg A; Sturk A; Reekers JA
    Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):563-6. PubMed ID: 8029432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Allergic-type adverse reactions to low osmolality contrast media in patients with a history of allergy or asthma.
    Simon MR
    Invest Radiol; 1995 May; 30(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 7558732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Electron microscopic comparison of the antithrombotic potential of 2 low osmolality iodine contrast media in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty].
    Lefèvre T; Bernard A; Bertrand M; Lablanche JM; Cequier A; Espuglas E; Gayet JL; Gosselin G; Bonan R
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1994 Feb; 87(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 7802530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thrombogenic potential of non-ionic contrast media--fact or fiction?
    Schräder R
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 23 Suppl 1():S10-3. PubMed ID: 9056158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of heparinized low osmolality ionic and nonionic contrast media in 500 patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Feldman RL
    Clin Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 13(11):794-6. PubMed ID: 2272136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ionized calcium levels in coronary sinus blood during coronary angiography: effects of four contrast media.
    Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Torizuka T; Okuno Y; Monji T; Uwatoko H; Kitamura K; Abe M
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):159-61. PubMed ID: 1549664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anticoagulant effects of nonionic versus ionic contrast media in angiography syringes.
    Grabowski EF; Kaplan KL; Halpern EF
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 2055738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of iodinated contrast media on blood clotting.
    Corot C; Perrin JM; Belleville J; Amiel M; Eloy R
    Invest Radiol; 1989 May; 24(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 2745021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.