491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15849637)
1. [Residual stability of different interbody fusion techniques after pedicle screw loosening].
Diedrich O; Kraft CN; Lüring C; Perlick L; Pennekamp PH
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 15849637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of translaminar facet joint fixation. A comparative study of poly-L-lactide pins, screws, and pedicle fixation.
Deguchi M; Cheng BC; Sato K; Matsuyama Y; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1307-12; discussion 1313. PubMed ID: 9654619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ
Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is pelvic fixation the only option to provide additional stability to the sacral anchorage in long lumbar instrumentation? A comparative biomechanical study of new techniques.
Volkheimer D; Reichel H; Wilke HJ; Lattig F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Mar; 43():34-39. PubMed ID: 28199880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of sacral screw strain and range of motion in long posterior spinal fixation constructs: effects of lumbosacral fixation strategies in reducing sacral screw strains.
Fleischer GD; Kim YJ; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Boachie-Adjei O
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):E163-9. PubMed ID: 21857409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of pedicle screw redirection after lateral wall breach--a biomechanical study using human lumbar vertebrae.
Stauff MP; Freedman BA; Kim JH; Hamasaki T; Yoon ST; Hutton WC
Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23623630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of the effects of pedicle screw fixation nut loosening on lumbar interbody fusion based on the elasto-plateau plasticity of bone characteristics.
Kim Y; Kim TW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 20139810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do facet screws provide the required stability in lumbar fixation? A biomechanical comparison of the Boucher technique and pedicular fixation in primary and circumferential fusions.
Agarwala A; Bucklen B; Muzumdar A; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 21849224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical Stability Afforded by Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with and without Interbody Support Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Godzik J; Martinez-Del-Campo E; Newcomb AGUS; Reis MT; Perez-Orribo L; Whiting AC; Singh V; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e439-e445. PubMed ID: 29462730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical analysis in a human cadaveric model of spinous process fixation with an interlaminar allograft spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis: Laboratory investigation.
Pradhan BB; Turner AW; Zatushevsky MA; Cornwall GB; Rajaee SS; Bae HW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):585-93. PubMed ID: 22519928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which posterior instrumentation is better for two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion: translaminar facet screw or pedicle screw?
Hou Y; Shen Y; Liu Z; Nie Z
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Jan; 133(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 23109094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Open versus endoscopic lumbar pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion in a sheep model: a feasibility study.
Jahng TA; Fu TS; Kim DH
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 15363422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.
Wilke HJ; Kaiser D; Volkheimer D; Hackenbroch C; Püschel K; Rauschmann M
Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2919-28. PubMed ID: 27405823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
