These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15850159)

  • 1. Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter?
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Szmalec A; Vandierendonck A
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 15850159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective stopping in task switching: The role of response selection and response execution.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 16610272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The nature of residual cost in regular switch response factors.
    Milán EG; González A; Sanabria D; Pereda A; Hochel M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 16310155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A carry-over task rule in task switching: an ERP investigation using a Go/Nogo paradigm.
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 23182873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task switching and action sequencing.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):526-40. PubMed ID: 16328435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Executive control in set switching: residual switch cost and task-set inhibition.
    Arbuthnott K; Frank J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 54(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 10721237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences.
    Milán EG; Sanabria D; Tornay F; González A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 15698827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Mar; 87(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 14972598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control and interference in task switching--a review.
    Kiesel A; Steinhauser M; Wendt M; Falkenstein M; Jost K; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Sep; 136(5):849-74. PubMed ID: 20804238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task preparation and task inhibition: a comment on Koch, Gade, Schuch, & Philipp (2010).
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 21327359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring adolescent cognitive control in a combined interference switching task.
    Mennigen E; Rodehacke S; Müller KU; Ripke S; Goschke T; Smolka MN
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Aug; 61():175-89. PubMed ID: 24971708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stop-signal task difficulty and the right inferior frontal gyrus.
    Hughes ME; Johnston PJ; Fulham WR; Budd TW; Michie PT
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():205-13. PubMed ID: 23973765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Same same but different? Modeling N-1 switch cost and N-2 repetition cost with the diffusion model and the linear ballistic accumulator model.
    Hartmann EM; Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102858. PubMed ID: 31276962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-stop-signal adjustments: inhibition improves subsequent inhibition.
    Bissett PG; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):955-66. PubMed ID: 22268912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):579-92. PubMed ID: 22390293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective activation of the superior frontal gyrus in task-switching: an event-related fNIRS study.
    Cutini S; Scatturin P; Menon E; Bisiacchi PS; Gamberini L; Zorzi M; Dell'Acqua R
    Neuroimage; 2008 Aug; 42(2):945-55. PubMed ID: 18586525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Switching of response modalities.
    Philipp AM; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Oct; 58(7):1325-38. PubMed ID: 16194961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.