These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15851341)

  • 1. Improved defibrillation efficacy with an ascending ramp waveform in humans.
    Shorofsky SR; Rashba E; Havel W; Belk P; Degroot P; Swerdlow C; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Apr; 2(4):388-94. PubMed ID: 15851341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stepped defibrillation waveform is substantially more efficient than the 50/50% tilt biphasic.
    Seidl K; Denman RA; Moulder JC; Mouchawar G; Stoeppler C; Becker T; Weise U; Anskey EJ; Burnett HE; Kroll MW
    Heart Rhythm; 2006 Dec; 3(12):1406-11. PubMed ID: 17161781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ascending-ramp biphasic waveform has a lower defibrillation threshold and releases less troponin I than a truncated exponential biphasic waveform.
    Huang J; Walcott GP; Ruse RB; Bohanan SJ; Killingsworth CR; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 2012 Sep; 126(11):1328-33. PubMed ID: 22865891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans.
    Sweeney MO; Natale A; Volosin KJ; Swerdlow CD; Baker JH; Degroot P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11227971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with single- or dual-coil defibrillation leads and active can.
    Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Zienciuk A; Królak T; Kempa M; Pazdyga A; Raczak G; Swiatecka G
    Kardiol Pol; 2005 Sep; 63(3):234-41; discussion 242-3. PubMed ID: 16180177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of shock waveform on relationship between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold.
    Swerdlow CD; Kass RM; O'Connor ME; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 9581950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of tuned waveforms based on different membrane time constants on defibrillation thresholds: primary results from the POWER trial.
    Doshi SK; Pittaro MD; Reeves R; Boyce K; Payne JP; Kroll MW; Graumann RJ; Oza AL; Val-Mejias JE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Oct; 35(10):1253-61. PubMed ID: 22906140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-microF and 120-microF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Raitt MH; Jones GK; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7805224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation: optimization of total pulse and second phase durations.
    Matula MH; Brooks MJ; Pan Q; Pless BD; Province RA; Echt DS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2154-62. PubMed ID: 9309738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Tuned" defibrillation waveforms outperform 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized multi-center study.
    Natarajan S; Henthorn R; Burroughs J; Esberg D; Zweibel S; Ross T; Kroll M; Gianola D; Oza A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S139-42. PubMed ID: 17302691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing.
    Green UB; Garg A; Al-Kandari F; Ungab G; Tone L; Feld GK
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Feb; 8(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 12652181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of adequate safety margin using single coupling interval-upper limit of vulnerability test.
    Patel MB; Pandya K; Thakur RK
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 24033830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1351-9. PubMed ID: 9286969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of fixed tilt and tuned defibrillation waveforms: the PROMISE study.
    Gold MR; Val-Mejias J; Cuoco F; Siddiqui M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 23210764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Relationship Between Cardiac Vulnerability and Restitution Properties of the Ventricular Activation Recovery Interval.
    Yamashita S; Yoshida A; Fukuzawa K; Nakanishi T; Matsumoto A; Konishi H; Ichibori H; Hyogo K; Imada H; Hirata K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 25810143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defibrillation efficacy of commercially available biphasic impulses in humans. Importance of negative-phase peak voltage.
    Tomassoni G; Newby K; Deshpande S; Axtell K; Sra J; Akhtar M; Natale A
    Circulation; 1997 Apr; 95(7):1822-6. PubMed ID: 9107169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of the defibrillation threshold using the upper limit of vulnerability following defibrillator implantation.
    Kirilmaz A; Dokumaci B; Uzun M; Kilicaslan F; Dinckal MH; Yucel O; Karaca M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):498-505. PubMed ID: 15955181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the pacing site, procainamide, and lead configuration on the relationship between the upper limit of vulnerability and the defibrillation threshold.
    Fan W; Gotoh M; Chen PS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jun; 18(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 7659583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Gurvich waveform has lower defibrillation threshold than the rectilinear waveform and the truncated exponential waveform in the rabbit heart.
    Qu F; Zarubin F; Wollenzier B; Nikolski VP; Efimov IR
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2005 Feb; 83(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 15791288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.