These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1585155)

  • 1. [Cephalic index: a neglected parameter of standard fetal biometry].
    Becker R; Brinnel C; Arabin B
    Ultraschall Med; 1992 Feb; 13(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 1585155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [3-dimensional (3D) echography in obstetrics. Advantages and limits].
    Berardi JC; Moulis M; de Lanete A; Godard J; Eole-Picq MJ
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(5):520-4. PubMed ID: 9417465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Apple-Macintosh compatible software for documentation, management and evaluation of ultrasound findings in obstetrics].
    Kurmanavicius J; Huch R; Huch A
    Ultraschall Med; 1993 Feb; 14(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 8465182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Indices for evaluating Doppler ultrasound images].
    Vetter K; Gonser M
    Gynakologe; 1992 Oct; 25(5):332-40. PubMed ID: 1468715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Attempt at three-dimensional imaging in obstetrics].
    Kratochwil A
    Ultraschall Med; 1992 Aug; 13(4):183-6. PubMed ID: 1411471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Accuracy of ultrasound weight assessment--comparison of vertex vs. breech presentation].
    Ragosch V; Entezami M; Hundertmark S; Mutz A; Becker R; Weitzel H
    Ultraschall Med; 1997 Feb; 18(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 9173522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The value of prepartal ultrasound estimation of birth weight in breech presentation].
    Kirschbaum M; Bödeker RH; Münstedt K; Künzel W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 May; 52(5):264-9. PubMed ID: 1612403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Ultrasound biometry of the fetal heart].
    Wilhelm C; Prömpeler H; Barth R; Schillinger H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1992; 114(6):279-86. PubMed ID: 1642055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalic index: a gestational age-dependent biometric parameter.
    Gray DL; Songster GS; Parvin CA; Crane JP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Oct; 74(4):600-3. PubMed ID: 2677864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal biometry charts for normal pregnant women in northeastern Thailand.
    Saksiriwuttho P; Ratanasiri T; Komwilaisak R
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Oct; 90(10):1963-9. PubMed ID: 18041409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
    Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An intelligent diagnostic system for the assessment of gestational age based on ultrasonic fetal head measurements.
    Beksaç MS; Odçikin Z; Egemen A; Karakaş U
    Technol Health Care; 1996 Aug; 4(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 8885099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
    Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ultrasonographic fetal biometry charts in Niger].
    Vangeenderhuysen C; Nono M
    Med Trop (Mars); 1998; 58(4):381-4. PubMed ID: 10399699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Vaginosonographic pelvimetry as a new method of the sonographic determination of internal pelvic measurements].
    Deutinger J; Bernaschek G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Jun; 46(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 3527857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements.
    Zalud I; Good S; Carneiro G; Georgescu B; Aoki K; Green L; Shahrestani F; Okumura R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Jan; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19165678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Maternal and fetal blood flow profile in labor].
    Weiss E
    Gynakologe; 1992 Oct; 25(5):306-16. PubMed ID: 1468712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Sonographic biometry of fetal organs].
    Wilhelm C; Prömpeler H; Räfle P; Schillinger H
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1991; 195(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 1926971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initial clinical experience with an interactive volume sonography visualization system.
    Nelson TR; Pretorius DH; Davidson TE
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():21-35. PubMed ID: 10163752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.