133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15852552)
21. Bone remodeling around total hip implants.
Smolinski P; Rubash HE
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(5-6):461-83. PubMed ID: 1486786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model.
Whyne CM; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):652-60. PubMed ID: 12671351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analogy of strain energy density based bone-remodeling algorithm and structural topology optimization.
Jang IG; Kim IY; Kwak BB
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jan; 131(1):011012. PubMed ID: 19045928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of two numerical approaches for bone remodelling.
Chen G; Pettet G; Pearcy M; McElwain DL
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jan; 29(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 16458567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlation of computed finite element stresses to bone density after remodeling around cementless femoral implants.
Skinner HB; Kilgus DJ; Keyak J; Shimaoka EE; Kim AS; Tipton JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Aug; (305):178-89. PubMed ID: 8050227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Simulation through the method of finite element of alendronate in a model of bone remodeling based on damage mechanics].
Zeman ME; García JM; Doblaré M
Acta Cient Venez; 2003; 54(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 14515765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Finite element modeling of trabecular bone damage.
Kosmopoulos V; Keller TS
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Jun; 6(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 12888432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Numeric simulation of functional remodeling of the anterior alveolar bone].
Wang WF; Xin HT; Zang SL; Ding J
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 47(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 22800702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses.
Baca V; Horak Z; Mikulenka P; Dzupa V
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Sep; 30(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 18243761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Micromotion and stress distribution of immediate loaded implants: a finite element analysis.
Fazel A; Aalai S; Rismanchian M; Sadr-Eshkevari P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 18783413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advances in collision detection and non-linear finite mixed element modelling for improved soft tissue simulation in craniomaxillofacial surgical planning.
Wang S; Yang J; Gee JC
Int J Med Robot; 2010 Mar; 6(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 19946886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An anisotropic internal-external bone adaptation model based on a combination of CAO and continuum damage mechanics technologies.
Garcia JM; Martínez MA; Doblaré M
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2001; 4(4):355-77. PubMed ID: 11328645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 3D strain map of axially loaded mouse tibia: a numerical analysis validated by experimental measurements.
Stadelmann VA; Hocke J; Verhelle J; Forster V; Merlini F; Terrier A; Pioletti DP
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Feb; 12(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18651261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Internal strain gradients quantified in bone under load using high-energy X-ray scattering.
Stock SR; Yuan F; Brinson LC; Almer JD
J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 21051040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A new approach for assigning bone material properties from CT images into finite element models.
Chen G; Schmutz B; Epari D; Rathnayaka K; Ibrahim S; Schuetz MA; Pearcy MJ
J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(5):1011-5. PubMed ID: 19942221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cortical bone development under the growth plate is regulated by mechanical load transfer.
Tanck E; Hannink G; Ruimerman R; Buma P; Burger EH; Huiskes R
J Anat; 2006 Jan; 208(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 16420380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bone remodelling around the tibia due to total ankle replacement: effects of implant material and implant-bone interfacial conditions.
Mondal S; Ghosh R
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Dec; 22(16):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 31497997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development of a finite element model of the tibia for short-duration high-force axial impact loading.
Quenneville CE; Dunning CE
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Feb; 14(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 21337226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
