759 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15853100)
1. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion.
Borsatto MC; Corona SA; Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; de Sá Rocha RA; Pecora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 16948375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of tooth preparation on microleakage behavior.
von Fraunhofer JA; Adachi EI; Barnes DM; Romberg E
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):526-33. PubMed ID: 11203866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of dentin deproteinization on microleakage of Class V composite restorations.
Toledano M; Perdigão J; Osorio R; Osorio E
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 11203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage in conservative cavities varying the preparation method and surface treatment.
Atoui JA; Chinelatti MA; Palma-Dibb RG; Corona SA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 20835580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
Ferdianakis K; White GE
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of microleakage of different margin types around Class V resin restorations in primary teeth.
Lopes Coutinho TC; Almeida Tostes M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 24295013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation.
Corona SA; Borsatto M; Dibb RG; Ramos RP; Brugnera A; Pécora JD
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 11551014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination.
Evancusky JW; Meiers JC
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10730285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gingival seal of deep Class II direct and indirect composite restorations.
Kenyon BJ; Frederickson D; Hagge MS
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17380801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of air abrasion and acid etching on the microleakage of preventive Class I resin restorations: an in vitro study.
Fu B; Hannig M
J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 10825871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
