These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15853102)

  • 1. Effect of prophylaxis regimens on surface roughness of glass ionomer cements.
    Wu SS; Yap AU; Chelvan S; Tan ES
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 15853102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of hygiene maintenance procedures on surface roughness of composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Wu SS; Chelvan S; Tan ES
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 15765964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface finish of resin-modified and highly viscous glass ionomer cements produced by new one-step systems.
    Yap AU; Ng JJ; Yap SH; Teo CK
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 14753338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing systems.
    Yap AU; Tan WS; Yeo JC; Yap WY; Ong SB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 12120776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material.
    Yap AU; Mok BY
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 11933907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.
    Yap AU; Yap SH; Teo CK; Ng JJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14753340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of four prophylaxis pastes on surface roughness of a composite, a hybrid ionomer, and a compomer restorative material.
    Warren DP; Colescott TD; Henson HA; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 12214949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass ionomer restoratives.
    Wang XY; Yap AU; Ngo HC
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 17024947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface roughness of fluoride-releasing restorative materials after topical fluoride application.
    Ozdemir-Ozenen D; Sungurtekin E; Issever H; Sandalli N
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 23597225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface roughness evaluation of resin modified glass-ionomers polished utilizing poly(acrylic acid) gel.
    Geiger S; Ravchanukayev M; Liberman R
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Sep; 26(9):704-9. PubMed ID: 10520144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of pH on the surface texture of glass ionomer based/containing restorative materials.
    Mohamed-Tahir MA; Yap AU
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):586-91. PubMed ID: 15470882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing time.
    Yap AU; Ong SB; Yap WY; Tan WS; Yeo JC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 12216564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials - an SEM study.
    Bagheri R; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 34(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 17207080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of instrumentation time on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Yap AU; Yeo EJ; Yap WY; Ong DS; Tan JW
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 12540118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of in-office bleaching products on surface finish of tooth-colored restorations.
    Wattanapayungkul P; Yap AU
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 12540113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.