These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15853111)

  • 1. Flexural properties of eight flowable light-cured restorative materials, in immediate vs 24-hour water storage.
    Tjandrawinata R; Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 15853111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A partially aromatic urethane dimethacrylate as a new substitute for Bis-GMA in restorative composites.
    Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 17767952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements.
    Saskalauskaite E; Tam LE; McComb D
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 18086139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Water sorption and flexural properties of a composite resin cement.
    Ortengren U; Elgh U; Spasenoska V; Milleding P; Haasum J; Karlsson S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 11203623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the flexural strength of five adhesive resin cements.
    Pace LL; Hummel SK; Marker VA; Bolouri A
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bis-(acrylamide)s as new cross-linkers for resin-based composite restoratives.
    Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1157-62. PubMed ID: 16386292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus comparisons of three differently cured denture base systems.
    Ali IL; Yunus N; Abu-Hassan MI
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):545-9. PubMed ID: 18761582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives.
    Irie M; Hatanaka K; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 16837038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of some properties of two fiber-reinforced composite materials.
    Lassila LV; Tezvergil A; Lahdenperä M; Alander P; Shinya A; Shinya A; Vallittu PK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Aug; 63(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 16040441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites.
    Attar N; Tam LE; McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Sep; 69(8):516-21. PubMed ID: 12954140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of veneering composite composition on the efficacy of fiber-reinforced restorations (FRR).
    Ellakwa A; Shortall A; Shehata M; Marquis P
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 11551011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in flexural properties of composite restoratives after aging in water.
    Yap AU; Chandra SP; Chung SM; Lim CT
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):468-74. PubMed ID: 12216565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of aluminum oxide addition on the flexural strength and thermal diffusivity of heat-polymerized acrylic resin.
    Ellakwa AE; Morsy MA; El-Sheikh AM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 18482365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.
    Cohen BI; Volovich Y; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 12017792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix.
    Bae JM; Kim KN; Hattori M; Hasegawa K; Yoshinari M; Kawada E; Oda Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11842902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of resin-based material combination on the compressive and the flexural strength.
    Gömeç Y; Dörter C; Dabanoglu A; Koray F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Feb; 32(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 15641978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flexural performance of flowable versus conventional light-cured composite resins in a long-term in vitro study.
    Irie M; Tjandrawinata R; E L; Yamashiro T; Kazuomi S
    Dent Mater J; 2008 Mar; 27(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 18540407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical properties of urethane and bis-acryl interim resin materials.
    Kerby RE; Knobloch LA; Sharples S; Peregrina A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jul; 110(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23849610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.