192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15853126)
1. A death by any other name: the federal government's inconsistent treatment of drugs used in lethal injections and physician-assisted suicide.
Miller C
J Law Health; 2002-2003; 17(2):217-40. PubMed ID: 15853126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court and the purposes of medicine.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):993-5. PubMed ID: 16525134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The assisted-suicide decision.
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 16429626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Oregon Death with Dignity Act: a successful model or a legal anomaly vulnerable to attack?
Boyle B
Houst Law Rev; 2004; 40(5):1387-421. PubMed ID: 16189902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Justices reject U.S. bid to block assisted suicide; Court, 6-3, says attorney general was wrong in Oregon case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16432926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Gonzales v. Oregon and the politics of medicine.
Lindsay RA
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2006 Mar; 16(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 16770893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Heckler v. Chaney: judicial and administrative regulation of capital punishment by lethal injection.
Stolls M
Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(2):251-77. PubMed ID: 3836576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Congress, controlled substances, and physician-assisted suicide--elephants in mouseholes.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2006 Mar; 354(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 16525147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Justices explore U.S. authority over states in assisted suicide.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Oct; ():A1, A32. PubMed ID: 16231463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Justices accept case weighing assisted suicide.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2005 Feb; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 15742514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Who defines "legitimate medical practice?" Lessons learned from the Controlled Substances Act, physician-assisted suicide, and Oregon v. Ashcroft.
Gast S
Va J Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):261-91. PubMed ID: 16493846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Attorney General's intrusion into clinical practice.
MacDonald R
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jun; 346(24):1918-9; author reply 1918-9. PubMed ID: 12063384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Gonzales v. Oregon upholds the Oregon Death with Dignity Act.
Sclar D
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(3):639-45. PubMed ID: 17144190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A matter of life or death. By upholding an assisted-suicide law, the Supreme Court helps reinforce the rights of doctors, patients and the statest.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2006 Jan; 36(4):6-7, 14, 1. PubMed ID: 16480096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oregon v. Ashcroft: the battle over the soul of medicine.
Rich BA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2003; 12(3):310-21. PubMed ID: 12889338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fraught issue, but narrow ruling in Oregon suicide case.
Egan T; Liptak A
N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A16. PubMed ID: 16429627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The war on assisted suicide.
Schwarz JK
Am J Nurs; 2002 Mar; 102(3):11. PubMed ID: 11976517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician-assisted suicide in Oregon--an uncertain future.
Steinbrook R
N Engl J Med; 2002 Feb; 346(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 11832544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Too many physicians: physician-assisted suicide after Glucksberg/Quill.
Pratt DA
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1999; 9():E1-E67. PubMed ID: 16528815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Oregon v. Ashcroft.
United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 368():1118-49. PubMed ID: 16477722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
