375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15853844)
1. Comparison of radiographic and clinical diagnosis of approximal and occlusal dental caries in a young adult population.
Hopcraft MS; Morgan MV
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 15853844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pattern of dental caries experience on tooth surfaces in an adult population.
Hopcraft MS; Morgan MV
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 34(3):174-83. PubMed ID: 16674749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic Yield for Clinical Caries Diagnosis in Young Adults: Indicators for Radiographic Examination.
Carvalho JC; Mestrinho HD; Guillet A; Maltz M
Caries Res; 2020; 54(2):154-164. PubMed ID: 32101874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnoses in posterior teeth of 12-year-old Lithuanian children.
Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V
Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 10460957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The prevalence of clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries in Scottish adolescents.
Creanor SL; Russell JI; Strang DM; Stephen KW; Burchell CK
Br Dent J; 1990 Sep; 169(5):126-9. PubMed ID: 2206666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of bitewing radiography on estimates of dental caries experience among children differs according to their disease experience.
Foster Page LA; Boyd D; Fuge K; Stevenson A; Goad K; Sim D; Thomson WM
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):137. PubMed ID: 30092796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnosis on posterior teeth of children seen at a Nigerian teaching hospital.
Popoola BO; Denloye OO; Ajayi DM; Sote EO
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Mar; 39(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 20632671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinically undetected dental caries assessed by bitewing screening in children with little caries experience.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8181654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The difference between clinical and bitewing detection of approximal and occlusal caries in Royal Air Force recruits.
Richardson PS; McIntyre IG
Community Dent Health; 1996 Jun; 13(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 8763134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective comparison between findings from a clinical examination and results of bitewing and panoramic radiographs for dental caries diagnosis in children.
Clark HC; Curzon ME
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Dec; 5(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 15606318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What difference does using bitewing radiographs make to epidemiological estimates of dental caries prevalence and severity in a young adolescent population with high caries experience?
Gowda S; Thomson WM; Foster Page LA; Croucher NA
Caries Res; 2009; 43(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 19864906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of bitewing radiographs for detecting approximal caries in 6-year-old children in the Netherlands.
Poorterman JH; Vermaire EH; Hoogstraten J
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Sep; 20(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 20545787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical assessment compared with bitewing radiography for detection of occlusal dentin caries.
Fracaro MS; Seow WK; McAllan LH; Purdie DM
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 11447949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Underestimation of the prevalence of approximal caries and inadequate restorations in a clinical epidemiological study.
Poorterman JH; Aartman IH; Kalsbeek H
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Oct; 27(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 10503793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of bite-wing radiographs in a clinical epidemiological study and their effect on the DMFS index.
Poorterman JH; Aartman IH; Kieft JA; Kalsbeek H
Caries Res; 2000; 34(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 10773634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of bitewing in enhancing the assessment of DMFS index in a group of Indian adolescents.
Tantradi P; Sreenivasan V; Kadaganche H
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(2):266-9. PubMed ID: 20657099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of approximal caries in 5-year-old Swedish children.
Anderson M; Stecksén-Blicks C; Stenlund H; Ranggård L; Tsilingaridis G; Mejàre I
Caries Res; 2005; 39(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 15741720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and radiographic judgement of occlusal caries in adolescents.
Poorterman JH; Weerheijm KL; Groen HJ; Kalsbeek H
Eur J Oral Sci; 2000 Apr; 108(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 10768720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries: a radiographic comparison.
Weerheijm KL; Groen HJ; Bast AJ; Kieft JA; Eijkman MA; van Amerongen WE
Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 1423448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relative diagnostic yields of clinical, FOTI and radiographic examinations for the detection of approximal caries in youngsters.
Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM; Pardi V
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 19553711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
