These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15854065)

  • 21. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measurement of Goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error.
    Choudhari NS; George R; Baskaran M; Vijaya L; Dudeja N
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18708256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measurements of intraocular pressure by Goldmann tonometry, Tonopen XL, and the transpalpebral tonometer, TGDc-01, after penetrating keratoplasty: a comparativye study.
    Shemesh G; Waisbourd M; Varssano D; Michaeli A; Lazar M; Kurtz S
    Cornea; 2009 Aug; 28(7):724-7. PubMed ID: 19574919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
    Rehnman JB; Martin L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 18565094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry*.
    van der Jagt LH; Jansonius NM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 16101949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18174841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the Proview pressure phosphene tonometer performed by the patient and examiner with the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Danesh-Meyer HV; Niederer R; Gaskin BJ; Gamble G
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 32(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 14746587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Gräf M; Hoffmann OF
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 200(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 1507794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry--a comparative study.
    Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Lindén C
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 18093261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Precision and accuracy of the ICare tonometer - Peripheral and central IOP measurements by rebound tonometry.
    Muttuvelu DV; Baggesen K; Ehlers N
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 90(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 20840218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The pressure phosphene tonometer--a clinical evaluation.
    Chew GS; Sanderson GF; Molteno AC
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Jun; 19(6):683-5. PubMed ID: 15192693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ; Evans NM; Fielder AR
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison between standard Goldmann applanation prism and disposable applanation prism in tonometry.
    Goel S; Chua C; Dong B; Butcher M; Ahfat F; Hindi SK; Kotta S
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Feb; 18(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 14762411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Li Y; Shi J; Duan X; Fan F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 248(12):1765-70. PubMed ID: 20495818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Self-measurement of intraocular pressure].
    Theisen R; Scherer V; Ruprecht KW
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2001 Apr; 24(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 11351210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Rietveld E; van den Bremer DA; Völker-Dieben HJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 89(5):537-9. PubMed ID: 15834078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
    García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
    Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.